Paper · 2011 · Zhongguo nongye Kexue

Effects of fertilization measures of nitrogen (N) on grain yield, grain quality and N-use efficiency of midseason rice in Hubei Province.

Han BaoJi; Xiangming Zeng; Zhuo GuangYi; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72) were used to study the effects of application technology of nitrogen(N) on grain yield,grain quality and N-use efficiency in Hubei province.【Method】Field trials with five N treatments(CK,FFP,modified FFP,SHY and modified SHY) and four replications were conducted synchronously at both Chibi County and Jingmen County,Hubei province in 2008 and 2009,respectively.【Result】The results showed that grain yield of the control with no N application at Chibi was significantly lower than that at Jingmen both in 2008 and in 2009,which implied that soil N fertility in Jingmen was higher than that in Chibi.Grain yield of modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP),super high yield(SHY) and modified SHY were more than that of FFP at Chibi with yield increase rates 10.0%,2.3% and 23.2%,respectively,in 2008;and 16.6%,11.8% and 22.6%,respectively in 2009.However,at Jingmen,grain yield of modified FFP,SHY and modified SHY were lower than that of FFP in 2008 and slightly more than that of FFP in 2009 with yield increase rates 2.0%,6.7% and 1.7%,respectively.Nitrogen agronomic efficiency(AE) and nitrogen partial factor productivity(PFP) of modified FFP and modified SHY were higher than that of FFP in Chibi.PFP of N of above two treatments was significantly higher,while AE slightly higher than that of FFP at Jingmen.N-use efficiencies(NUE) of SHY at two field trial spots in two years were far lower than that of other treatments.【Conclusion】 Both modified FFP and modified SHY treatments achieved higher grain yield and higher NUE,which suggested that 20% reduction of nitrogen of FFP could increase grain yield as well as NUE.On the contrary,too much N application would not increase,even reduce grain yield.In addition,the optimized nitrogen management could also improve the grain quality of rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield with no N application was significantly lower at Chibi than at Jingmen in 2008 and 2009.

Treatment
no N applicatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
Jingmene1
Setting
Chibie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield of the control with no N application at Chibi was significantly lower than that at Jingmen both in 2008 and in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP) increased grain yield over FFP at Chibi by 10.0% in 2008.

Treatment
modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP)e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
10.0%e1
Qualifier
2008e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Chibie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP),super high yield(SHY) and modified SHY were more than that of FFP at Chibi with yield increase rates 10.0%,2.3% and 23.2%,respectively,in 2008;and 16.6%,11.8% and 22.6%,respectively in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

super high yield(SHY) increased grain yield over FFP at Chibi by 2.3% in 2008.

Treatment
super high yield(SHY)e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
2.3%e1
Qualifier
2008e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Chibie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP),super high yield(SHY) and modified SHY were more than that of FFP at Chibi with yield increase rates 10.0%,2.3% and 23.2%,respectively,in 2008;and 16.6%,11.8% and 22.6%,respectively in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

modified SHY increased grain yield over FFP at Chibi by 23.2% in 2008.

Treatment
modified SHYe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
23.2%e1
Qualifier
2008e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Chibie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP),super high yield(SHY) and modified SHY were more than that of FFP at Chibi with yield increase rates 10.0%,2.3% and 23.2%,respectively,in 2008;and 16.6%,11.8% and 22.6%,respectively in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP) increased grain yield over FFP at Chibi by 16.6% in 2009.

Treatment
modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP)e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
16.6%e1
Qualifier
2009e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Chibie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP),super high yield(SHY) and modified SHY were more than that of FFP at Chibi with yield increase rates 10.0%,2.3% and 23.2%,respectively,in 2008;and 16.6%,11.8% and 22.6%,respectively in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

super high yield(SHY) increased grain yield over FFP at Chibi by 11.8% in 2009.

Treatment
super high yield(SHY)e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
11.8%e1
Qualifier
2009e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Chibie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP),super high yield(SHY) and modified SHY were more than that of FFP at Chibi with yield increase rates 10.0%,2.3% and 23.2%,respectively,in 2008;and 16.6%,11.8% and 22.6%,respectively in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

modified SHY increased grain yield over FFP at Chibi by 22.6% in 2009.

Treatment
modified SHYe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
22.6%e1
Qualifier
2009e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Chibie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of modified farmers' fertilizer practice(FFP),super high yield(SHY) and modified SHY were more than that of FFP at Chibi with yield increase rates 10.0%,2.3% and 23.2%,respectively,in 2008;and 16.6%,11.8% and 22.6%,respectively in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified FFP, SHY and modified SHY gave lower grain yield than FFP at Jingmen in 2008.

Treatment
modified FFP,SHY and modified SHYe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
2008e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Jingmene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Jingmen,grain yield of modified FFP,SHY and modified SHY were lower than that of FFP in 2008 and slightly more than that of FFP in 2009 with yield increase rates 2.0%,6.7% and 1.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

modified FFP gave slightly higher grain yield than FFP at Jingmen in 2009, with a yield increase of 2.0%.

Treatment
modified FFPe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
slightly moree1
Value
2.0%e1
Qualifier
2009e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Jingmene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Jingmen,grain yield of modified FFP,SHY and modified SHY were lower than that of FFP in 2008 and slightly more than that of FFP in 2009 with yield increase rates 2.0%,6.7% and 1.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHY gave slightly higher grain yield than FFP at Jingmen in 2009, with a yield increase of 6.7%.

Treatment
SHYe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
slightly moree1
Value
6.7%e1
Qualifier
2009e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Jingmene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Jingmen,grain yield of modified FFP,SHY and modified SHY were lower than that of FFP in 2008 and slightly more than that of FFP in 2009 with yield increase rates 2.0%,6.7% and 1.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

modified SHY gave slightly higher grain yield than FFP at Jingmen in 2009, with a yield increase of 1.7%.

Treatment
modified SHYe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
slightly moree1
Value
1.7%e1
Qualifier
2009e1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Jingmene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Jingmen,grain yield of modified FFP,SHY and modified SHY were lower than that of FFP in 2008 and slightly more than that of FFP in 2009 with yield increase rates 2.0%,6.7% and 1.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity of modified FFP and modified SHY were higher than FFP at Chibi.

Treatment
modified FFP and modified SHYe1
Outcome
Nitrogen agronomic efficiency(AE) and nitrogen partial factor productivity(PFP)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Chibie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen agronomic efficiency(AE) and nitrogen partial factor productivity(PFP) of modified FFP and modified SHY were higher than that of FFP in Chibi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial factor productivity of N was significantly higher for the two modified treatments than FFP at Jingmen.

Treatment
above two treatmentse1
Outcome
PFP of Ne1
Direction
significantly highere1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Jingmene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“PFP of N of above two treatments was significantly higher,while AE slightly higher than that of FFP at Jingmen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic efficiency of N was slightly higher for the two modified treatments than FFP at Jingmen.

Treatment
above two treatmentse1
Outcome
AEe1
Direction
slightly highere1
Comparator
FFPe1
Setting
Jingmene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“PFP of N of above two treatments was significantly higher,while AE slightly higher than that of FFP at Jingmen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-use efficiency of SHY was far lower than that of other treatments at two sites over two years.

Treatment
SHYe1
Outcome
N-use efficiencies(NUE)e1
Direction
far lowere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“N-use efficiencies(NUE) of SHY at two field trial spots in two years were far lower than that of other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified FFP and modified SHY achieved higher grain yield.

Treatment
modified FFP and modified SHY treatmentse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both modified FFP and modified SHY treatments achieved higher grain yield and higher NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified FFP and modified SHY achieved higher NUE.

Treatment
modified FFP and modified SHY treatmentse1
Outcome
NUEe1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both modified FFP and modified SHY treatments achieved higher grain yield and higher NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20% reduction of nitrogen relative to FFP could increase grain yield as well as NUE.

Treatment
20% reduction of nitrogen of FFPe1
Outcome
grain yield as well as NUEe1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggested that 20% reduction of nitrogen of FFP could increase grain yield as well as NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Too much N application would not increase and would even reduce grain yield.

Treatment
too much N applicatione1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“too much N application would not increase,even reduce grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized nitrogen management could also improve the grain quality of rice.

Treatment
optimized nitrogen managemente1
Outcome
grain qualitye1
Direction
improvee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four popular midseason varieties of rice(Luoyou8,Guohaozayou1,Fengyou22 and Jufengyou72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“the optimized nitrogen management could also improve the grain quality of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1898 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,803 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.