Paper · 2013 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of sowing dates, fertility levels and cutting managements on growth, yield and quality of oats (Avena sativa L.)

Intikhab Aalum Jehangir; H. U. Khan; M. H. Khan; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A two year study was conducted during rabi seasons of 2009-10 and 2010-11 at Research Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir to find out the influence of sowing dates, fertility levels and cutting management on growth, yield and quality of oats. The results revealed that September 30 sowing recorded significant improvement in green fodder yield over October 10 sowing. Crude protein content was highest in October 10 sown crop, whereas crude fibre was highest in September 20 sown crop. The fertility level of 150:70:40 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1) significantly increased both green and dry fodder yield as well as crude protein content over 125:60:30 and 100:50:20 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1), however crude fibre content significantly decreased with increase in fertility level. Double cut crop recorded 14.75 and 16.24% increase in green fodder yield and 3.70 and 1.36% in dry fodder yield over single cut crop during 2009-10 and 2010-11, respectively. Moreover, double cut crop recorded higher crude protein content but lower crude fibre content. Key words: Sowing dates, fertility levels, cutting management, green and dry fodder yield, crude protein, crude fibre, oats.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

September 30 sowing improved green fodder yield over October 10.

Treatment
September 30 sowinge0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
October 10 sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“September 30 sowing recorded significant improvement in green fodder yield over October 10 sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–415 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein was highest with October 10 sowing.

Treatment
October 10e0
Outcome
Crude protein contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crude protein content was highest in October 10 sown crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude fibre was highest with September 20 sowing.

Treatment
September 20e0
Outcome
crude fibree0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude fibre was highest in September 20 sown crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150:70:40 fertility level significantly increased green and dry fodder yield over lower levels.

Treatment
150:70:40 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
green and dry fodder yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
125:60:30 and 100:50:20 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertility level of 150:70:40 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1) significantly increased both green and dry fodder yield as well as crude protein content over 125:60:30 and 100:50:20 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150:70:40 fertility level significantly increased crude protein content over lower levels.

Treatment
150:70:40 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
125:60:30 and 100:50:20 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertility level of 150:70:40 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1) significantly increased both green and dry fodder yield as well as crude protein content over 125:60:30 and 100:50:20 (N:P2O5:K2O kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude fibre significantly decreased as fertility increased.

Treatment
fertility levele0
Outcome
crude fibre contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude fibre content significantly decreased with increase in fertility level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting increased green fodder yield by 14.75% in 2009-10 over single cutting.

Treatment
Double cute0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.75e0
Qualifier
2009-10e0
Comparator
single cute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double cut crop recorded 14.75 and 16.24% increase in green fodder yield and 3.70 and 1.36% in dry fodder yield over single cut crop during 2009-10 and 2010-11, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting increased green fodder yield by 16.24% in 2010-11.

Treatment
Double cute0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
16.24%e0
Qualifier
2010-11e0
Comparator
single cute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double cut crop recorded 14.75 and 16.24% increase in green fodder yield and 3.70 and 1.36% in dry fodder yield over single cut crop during 2009-10 and 2010-11, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting increased dry fodder yield by 3.70% in 2009-10.

Treatment
Double cute0
Outcome
dry fodder yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.70e0
Qualifier
2009-10e0
Comparator
single cute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double cut crop recorded 14.75 and 16.24% increase in green fodder yield and 3.70 and 1.36% in dry fodder yield over single cut crop during 2009-10 and 2010-11, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting increased dry fodder yield by 1.36% in 2010-11.

Treatment
Double cute0
Outcome
dry fodder yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.36%e0
Qualifier
2010-11e0
Comparator
single cute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double cut crop recorded 14.75 and 16.24% increase in green fodder yield and 3.70 and 1.36% in dry fodder yield over single cut crop during 2009-10 and 2010-11, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting gave higher crude protein content.

Treatment
double cute0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double cut crop recorded higher crude protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting gave lower crude fibre content.

Treatment
double cute0
Outcome
crude fibre contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double cut crop recorded higher crude protein content but lower crude fibre content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

potassium · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

potassium · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.