Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at Al-Noran Farm, Al-Abtal Village-East of Suez Canal, Ismailia Governorate (latitude of 300 18 N and longitude of 320 30 E) in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 seasons to evaluate the performance of three sugar beet varieties and their response to different levels of humic acid and potassium fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) under sandy soils conditions irrigated by center pivot system. The present work included twenty seven treatments, which were the combinations of three mono-germ sugar beet varieties: (1. Natoura, 2. Henrike and 3. Polat varieties), three levels of humic acid (without humic acid; 10 liter and 15 liter of humic acid/400 liter water/fed, furthermore three levels of potassien-P compound (30% K2O and 8% P2O5/l as foliar application): without potassien ; one liter and 2 liters /400 liter water/fed. Humic acid treatments were added twice after full emergence and 10 days later after the initial spray. Potassien levels were sprayed twice at 6-8 and at 8-10 leaf stage later. The treatments were arranged in strip split plots design with three replications in the two seasons. Results indicated that varieties significantly differed among them where, Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons as well as root and leaves dry weights% in 2nd season, while insignificant differences were found between Polat and Henrike varieties in root diameter and top fresh weight/plant in the 1st season, root fresh weight/plant and LAI in the 2nd season. There were no significant differences among varieties in their impact on gross and corrected sugar yields/fed in both seasons. Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed. While, there were no significant differences among the two rates in their impact on gross and corrected sugar yields/fed in both seasons. Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment. The interaction between tested sugar beet varieties and humic acid levels showed that significant increase in root dry weight% in both seasons, root fresh weight/plant in the first season and quality index in 2nd season when Polat variety planted in soil treated with 15 liter humic acid/fed. While, sowing Polat variety in soil was treated with 10 liter humic acid/fed recorded the highest significant value in top fresh weight/plant in the 1st season only. The interaction effect between tested sugar beet varieties and potassien levels indicated that Polat variety sprayed with 2 liter potassien/fed was more distinguished as compared to the other two varieties. The interaction effect between humic acid and potassien levels revealed that the highest significant values in root fresh weight/plant, root dry weight% in both seasons, top fresh and dry weights/plant in the 1st season, as well as root and gross sugar yields/fed in 2nd season were between soil application of 15 liter humic acid along foliar application of 2 liter potassien/fed in both seasons. it could be concluded that sowing polat variety fertilized with combination of humic acid at rate of 15 liters/fed as a soil applicaion along with sprayed 2 l/potassein/fed to get the maxiumum of root and sugar yields/fed |in sandy soils under center pivot irrigation system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Polat had higher root diameter, plant weights and top yield than the other varieties.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Material
- Polate0
- Outcome
- root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fede0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- other two tested varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Polat had highest root and leaf dry weight percentages in the second season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Polate2
- Outcome
- root and leaves dry weights%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root and leaves dry weights% in 2nd season”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Polat and Henrike did not differ significantly in selected root and top traits.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Polate0
- Outcome
- root diameter and top fresh weight/plante0
- Direction
- insignificant differencese0
- Comparator
- Henrikee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“insignificant differences were found between Polat and Henrike varieties in root diameter and top fresh weight/plant in the 1st season, root fresh weight/plant and LAI in the 2nd season”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties did not differ significantly in gross and corrected sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- gross and corrected sugar yields/fede0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were no significant differences among varieties in their impact on gross and corrected sugar yields/fed in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
15 l humic acid increased root and top size and dry weights compared with 10 liter.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 15 l humic acide0
- Outcome
- root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plante0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 10 liter humic acid/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
15 l humic acid increased root, top and sugar yields compared with 10 liter.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 15 l humic acide1
- Outcome
- root, top and sugar yields/fede0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 10 liter humic acid/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
15 l humic acid increased sugar percentages in the second season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 15 l humic acide1
- Outcome
- gross sugar% and corrected sugar%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd season onlye0
- Comparator
- 10 liter humic acid/fede0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The two humic acid rates did not significantly differ in sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 15 l humic acide1
- Outcome
- gross and corrected sugar yields/fede0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- 10 liter humic acid/fede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there were no significant differences among the two rates in their impact on gross and corrected sugar yields/fed in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
2 l potassien increased LAI, root size and fresh and dry weights.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 2 l potassien/fede0
- Outcome
- LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- check treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
2 l potassien increased sugar percentages, quality index and yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 2 l potassien/fede0
- Outcome
- gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fede0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
2 l potassien reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 2 l potassien/fede3
- Outcome
- Na and alpha amino-N contentse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- check treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Polat with 15 liter humic acid increased root dry weight percentage and other traits.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Polate0
- Treatment
- 15 liter humic acid/fede0
- Outcome
- root dry weight%e0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant increase in root dry weight% in both seasons, root fresh weight/plant in the first season and quality index in 2nd season when Polat variety planted in soil treated with 15 liter humic acid/fed”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Polat with 10 liter humic acid had the highest top fresh weight in the first season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Polate0
- Treatment
- 10 liter humic acid/fede0
- Outcome
- top fresh weight/plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Polat variety in soil was treated with 10 liter humic acid/fed recorded the highest significant value in top fresh weight/plant in the 1st season only”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Polat with 2 liter potassien was more distinguished than the other varieties.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Polate0
- Treatment
- 2 liter potassien/fede0
- Outcome
- more distinguishede0
- Direction
- more distinguishede0
- Comparator
- other two varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Polat variety sprayed with 2 liter potassien/fed was more distinguished as compared to the other two varieties”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 15 liter humic acid and 2 liter potassien gave highest root fresh weight and dry weight percentage.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- soil application of 15 liter humic acid along foliar application of 2 liter potassien/fede0
- Outcome
- root fresh weight/plant, root dry weight%e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest significant values in root fresh weight/plant, root dry weight% in both seasons, top fresh and dry weights/plant in the 1st season, as well as root and gross sugar yields/fed in 2nd season were between soil application of 15 liter humic acid along foliar application of 2 liter potassien/fed in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 15 liter humic acid and 2 liter potassien gave highest top weights and sugar yields in specified seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- soil application of 15 liter humic acid along foliar application of 2 liter potassien/fede0
- Outcome
- top fresh and dry weights/plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest significant values in root fresh weight/plant, root dry weight% in both seasons, top fresh and dry weights/plant in the 1st season, as well as root and gross sugar yields/fed in 2nd season were between soil application of 15 liter humic acid along foliar application of 2 liter potassien/fed in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended Polat with combined humic acid and potassien for maximum root and sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- polate0
- Treatment
- humic acid at rate of 15 liters/fed as a soil applicaion along with sprayed 2 l/potassein/fede0
- Outcome
- maxiumum of root and sugar yields/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sowing polat variety fertilized with combination of humic acid at rate of 15 liters/fed as a soil applicaion along with sprayed 2 l/potassein/fed to get the maxiumum of root and sugar yields/fed”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
t1“SUGAR BEET”
e1“Soil application of 15 l humic acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of root and top dry weights%, leaf area index, root and top dry weights/plant, root, top and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as gross sugar% and corrected sugar% in 2nd season only, as compared to 10 liter humic acid/fed”
e2“Polat variety show the superiority over the other two tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter, fresh and top weights/plant, top yield/fed in both seasons”
e3“Foliar application of 2 l potassien/fed increased LAI, root diameter, root and top fresh weights/plant, root and top dry weights%, gross sugar%, corrected sugar%, quality index, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons as well as reduced Na and alpha amino-N contents in comparison to the check treatment”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →other · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
23 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →other · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
27 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.