Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Production

Yield and Quality of some Sugar Beet Varieties as Affected by Humic Acid Application Rates under Sandy Soil Condition

F. Abu-Ellail; K. A. Sadek; E. H. S. El-Laboudy

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at privet farm of Demo (29° 17ˋ N, 30° 53ˋ E), Fayoum Governorate, Egypt, during 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 to study the effect of three humic acid treatments, i.e. (0 without humic acid as control, 3.5 and 7 Kg humic acid/fed) on quality and yield traits of eight sugar beet varieties (Santolhne, Pepite, Amina, Beta 401, Dina, Grinta, Sirona and Bts 302). Results indicated that root yield (ton/fed) was increased by increasing the rates of humic acid from 3.5 to 7kg per fed in the first season (27.02 and 29.11 ton/fed, respectively), corresponding (28.08 and 29.72 ton/fed in the second season respectively). Similarly, the content of molasses forming substances showed more reduction in 3.5 than in 7kg/fed treatment. Nevertheless, the trend of increasing content of sucrose and refined sugar was associated with humic acid rates. Results showed that varieties significantly differed among them where, Sirona variety show the superiority over the other seven tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter (14.19 and 15.14 cm, respectively), fresh root weights/plant (1.41 and 1.47 kg, respectively), in both seasons, as well as root yield/fed (29.94) in 2nd season. While, in first season variety (Bts 302) registered the highest values of root yield (29.42 ton/fed), also this variety recorded the highest sugar yield (4.62 and 5.23 ton/fed, respectively) in both seasons. Highly significant interaction effects between humic acid and varieties root yield and sugar yield and their related traits in both seasons. it could be concluded that fertilization with humic acid at a rate of 7kg /fed as a soil application to get the maximum of root and sugar yields/fed in sandy soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising humic acid from 3.5 to 7 kg/fed increased sugar beet root yield in the first season (27.02 and 29.11 ton/fed).

Treatment
increasing the rates of humic acid from 3.5 to 7kg per fede1
Outcome
root yield (ton/fed)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
27.02 and 29.11 ton/fede1
Qualifier
first seasone1
Comparator
3.5e1
Setting
Fayoum Governorate, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fayoum Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“root yield (ton/fed) was increased by increasing the rates of humic acid from 3.5 to 7kg per fed in the first season (27.02 and 29.11 ton/fed, respectively), corresponding (28.08 and 29.72 ton/fed in the second season respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising humic acid from 3.5 to 7 kg/fed increased sugar beet root yield in the second season (28.08 and 29.72 ton/fed).

Treatment
increasing the rates of humic acid from 3.5 to 7kg per fede1
Outcome
root yield (ton/fed)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
28.08 and 29.72 ton/fede1
Qualifier
second seasone1
Comparator
3.5e1
Setting
Fayoum Governorate, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fayoum Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“root yield (ton/fed) was increased by increasing the rates of humic acid from 3.5 to 7kg per fed in the first season (27.02 and 29.11 ton/fed, respectively), corresponding (28.08 and 29.72 ton/fed in the second season respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 3.5 kg/fed gave more reduction of molasses-forming substances than 7 kg/fed.

Treatment
3.5e2
Outcome
content of molasses forming substancese2
Direction
more reductione2
Comparator
7kg/fed treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e2

“the content of molasses forming substances showed more reduction in 3.5 than in 7kg/fed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–752 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Content of sucrose and refined sugar increased with humic acid rates.

Treatment
humic acid ratese3
Outcome
content of sucrose and refined sugare3
Direction
increasinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“the trend of increasing content of sucrose and refined sugar was associated with humic acid rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–865 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sirona had the highest root diameter among the eight sugar beet varieties (14.19 and 15.14 cm).

Material
Sironae4
Outcome
root diametere4
Direction
higheste4
Value
14.19 and 15.14 cme4
Comparator
the other seven tested varietiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sirona variety show the superiority over the other seven tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter (14.19 and 15.14 cm, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1095 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sirona had the highest fresh root weight per plant (1.41 and 1.47 kg) in both seasons.

Material
Sironae4
Outcome
fresh root weights/plante5
Direction
higheste4
Value
1.41 and 1.47 kge5
Qualifier
in both seasonse5
Comparator
the other seven tested varietiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sirona variety show the superiority over the other seven tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter (14.19 and 15.14 cm, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1095 · show in text ↑
e5

“fresh root weights/plant (1.41 and 1.47 kg, respectively), in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1171 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sirona had the highest root yield per feddan (29.94 ton/fed) in the second season.

Material
Sironae4
Outcome
root yield/fede6
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
29.94e6
Qualifier
in 2nd seasone6
Comparator
the other seven tested varietiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sirona variety show the superiority over the other seven tested varieties and recorded the highest values of root diameter (14.19 and 15.14 cm, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1095 · show in text ↑
e6

“root yield/fed (29.94) in 2nd season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1220 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bts 302 had the highest root yield (29.42 ton/fed) in the first season.

Material
Bts 302e7
Outcome
root yielde7
Direction
higheste7
Value
29.42 ton/fede7
Qualifier
in first seasone7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e7

“in first season variety (Bts 302) registered the highest values of root yield (29.42 ton/fed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1322 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bts 302 had the highest sugar yield (4.62 and 5.23 ton/fed) in both seasons.

Material
Bts 302e7
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.62 and 5.23 ton/fede1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e7

“in first season variety (Bts 302) registered the highest values of root yield (29.42 ton/fed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1322 · show in text ↑
e1

“this variety recorded the highest sugar yield (4.62 and 5.23 ton/fed, respectively) in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1428 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid and variety interaction effects on root and sugar yield were highly significant in both seasons.

Treatment
humic acide1
Outcome
root yield and sugar yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highly significant interaction effects between humic acid and varieties root yield and sugar yield and their related traits in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1569 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 7 kg/fed applied to the soil maximises root and sugar yield in sandy soil.

Treatment
fertilization with humic acid at a rate of 7kg /fed as a soil applicatione1
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fede1
Setting
sandy soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization with humic acid at a rate of 7kg /fed as a soil application to get the maximum of root and sugar yields/fed in sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1733 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.