Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at the experimental farm of Delta Sugar Company at El-Hamoul area in North of Egypt, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt during 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 winter seasons, to study the effect of Nano and normal fertilizer on yield and quality of sugar beet, cv. Karam., (Beta vulgaris, L) The experiments were carried out in strip plot design, where the vertical plots were devoted to soil application of fertilizers, while the horizontal plots were assigned to foliar fertilization treatments. The obtained results indicated that fertilized sugar beet plants with 50kgN+green Foliar (20L/fed) as soil fertilization gave the highest relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR) and crop growth rate (CGR), root length, root fresh weight and, sucrose percentage, root yield /fed, and sugar yield /fed as compared with 100KgN/fed as well as 50kgN+green Foliar(10L/fed) treatments in both seasons. While, the highest purity percentage was found with 50kgN+green Foliar (10L/fed) treatment, on the other hand, applied 100 kg N /fed gave the lowest purity percentage 88.40 and 89.48 % in 2021 and 2021/2022 seasons, respectively. Results exhibited that spraying sugar beet plants with Malty green (2.5L/fed.) +Nano calcium (2.5L/fed.) gave the highest values of all studied traits in both seasons. On the contrary, sprayed sugar beet plants with tap water (control) gave the lowest values of all studied traits in both seasons. RY traits depicted a significant positive correlation with NAR, CGR and SY (p<0.05) in 2020/2021. However, in the second season of 2021/2022, RY showed a significant positive correlation with all the studied traits as RGR, NAR, RL, FW, sucrose %, purity%, and SY, under four foliar fertilizers and three soil fertilizers in both seasons. In conclusion, fertilizing sugar beet plants with 50kgN/fed +Green Foliar (20L/fed) as a soil address and spraying by Malty green (2.5L/fed.) + Nano calcium (2.5L/fed.) treatment to maximizing root and sugar yields of sugar beet plants cv. Karam at El-Hamoul area condition, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
The 50kgN plus 20L/fed green Foliar treatment gave the highest growth rates.
- Taxon
- sugar beet plants
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 50kgN+green Foliar (20L/fed)e0
- Outcome
- relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR) and crop growth rate (CGR)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fertilized sugar beet plants with 50kgN+green Foliar (20L/fed) as soil fertilization gave the highest relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR) and crop growth rate (CGR)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50kgN plus 20L/fed green Foliar treatment gave the highest root length and fresh weight.
- Taxon
- sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- 50kgN+green Foliar (20L/fed)e0
- Outcome
- root length, root fresh weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fertilized sugar beet plants with 50kgN+green Foliar (20L/fed) as soil fertilization gave the highest relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR) and crop growth rate (CGR), root length, root fresh weight”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50kgN plus 20L/fed green Foliar treatment gave the highest sucrose percentage and root and sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- sucrose percentage, root yield /fed, and sugar yield /fede0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Comparator
- 100KgN/fede0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sucrose percentage, root yield /fed, and sugar yield /fed as compared with 100KgN/fed as well as 50kgN+green Foliar(10L/fed) treatments”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The 10L/fed green Foliar treatment gave the highest purity.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 50kgN+green Foliar (10L/fed)e0
- Outcome
- purity percentagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest purity percentage was found with 50kgN+green Foliar (10L/fed) treatment”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100 kg N/fed treatment gave the lowest purity, at 88.40 and 89.48% in the respective seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 100 kg N /fede0
- Outcome
- purity percentagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 88.40 and 89.48 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“applied 100 kg N /fed gave the lowest purity percentage 88.40 and 89.48 % in 2021 and 2021/2022 seasons, respectively”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Malty green plus Nano calcium foliar spray gave the highest studied trait values.
- Taxon
- sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Malty green (2.5L/fed.) +Nano calcium (2.5L/fed.)e0
- Outcome
- all studied traitse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying sugar beet plants with Malty green (2.5L/fed.) +Nano calcium (2.5L/fed.) gave the highest values of all studied traits in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Tap water control gave the lowest studied trait values.
- Taxon
- sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- tap water (control)e0
- Outcome
- all studied traitse0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sprayed sugar beet plants with tap water (control) gave the lowest values of all studied traits in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Root yield correlated positively with NAR, CGR and sugar yield in 2020/2021.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- RY traitse0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Qualifier
- p<0.05e0
- Comparator
- NAR, CGR and SYe0
Not reportedOrgan / stage
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RY traits depicted a significant positive correlation with NAR, CGR and SY (p<0.05) in 2020/2021”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Root yield correlated positively with all listed traits in 2021/2022.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- RYe0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Comparator
- RGR, NAR, RL, FW, sucrose %, purity%, and SYe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RY showed a significant positive correlation with all the studied traits as RGR, NAR, RL, FW, sucrose %, purity%, and SY”
t0“sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend the combined soil and foliar treatments to maximize root and sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beet plantsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- 50kgN/fed +Green Foliar (20L/fed)e0
- Outcome
- maximizing root and sugar yieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fertilizing sugar beet plants with 50kgN/fed +Green Foliar (20L/fed) as a soil address and spraying by Malty green (2.5L/fed.) + Nano calcium (2.5L/fed.) treatment to maximizing root and sugar yields”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.