Paper · 2019 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Urea Nitrapyrin Placement Effects on Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions in Claypan Soil

Tyler W. Steusloff; Kelly A. Nelson; Peter P. Motavalli; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Corn ( Zea mays L.) production in poorly drained claypan soils in the US Midwest is a challenge due to low soil permeability, which may result in wetter soil conditions and relatively large amounts of soil N 2 O emissions early in the growing season. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of urea fertilizer placement with and without nitrapyrin (NI) on daily and cumulative soil N 2 O emissions, and yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions in 2016 and 2017. Treatments included urea deep banded to a 20‐cm depth (DB), urea deep banded to 20 cm plus NI (DB+NI), urea incorporated after a surface broadcast application to ∼8‐cm depth (IA), urea broadcast on the soil surface (SA), and a nonfertilized control (NTC). Fertilizer was applied at 202 kg N ha −1 . Surface soil N 2 O efflux rates were generally lower (<50 g N 2 O‐N ha −1 d −1 ) during the first 3 wk after N fertilization and latter parts of the growing seasons. When averaged across the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons, all fertilized treatments had significantly greater (2.33–5.60 kg N 2 O‐N ha −1 , P < 0.05) cumulative soil N 2 O emissions than NTC. The DB+NI treatment had 54 and 55% lower cumulative soil N 2 O emissions than IA and SA, respectively. In 2017, DB+NI had similar soil yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions to NTC. Percentage grain yield increase over NTC was highest for DB and DB+NI. Grain yield in 2016 was 14 to 18% higher for DB and DB+NI than SA. Results suggest that DB+NI is an effective management strategy for reducing cumulative soil N 2 O emissions and increasing grain yields over the growing season. Core Ideas Deep‐banded urea + nitrapyrin had 55% less soil N 2 O emissions than surface‐applied. Nonfertilized control and deep‐banded urea + nitrapyrin had similar N 2 O emissions. Deep‐banded urea + nitrapyrin had a 1.6% lower emission factor than surface‐applied urea. Deep‐banded urea had a 1.0% lower emission factor than surface‐applied urea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized treatments had greater cumulative soil N2O emissions than nonfertilized control.

Treatment
all fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
cumulative soil N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
2.33–5.60 kg N 2 O‐N ha −1e0
Comparator
NTCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all fertilized treatments had significantly greater (2.33–5.60 kg N 2 O‐N ha −1 , P < 0.05) cumulative soil N 2 O emissions than NTC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1122 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI lowered cumulative soil N2O emissions 54% versus IA.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
cumulative soil N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
54e0
Comparator
IAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DB+NI treatment had 54 and 55% lower cumulative soil N 2 O emissions than IA and SA, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI lowered cumulative soil N2O emissions 55% versus SA.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
cumulative soil N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
55%e0
Comparator
SAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DB+NI treatment had 54 and 55% lower cumulative soil N 2 O emissions than IA and SA, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI and NTC had similar yield-scaled emissions in 2017.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
soil yield‐scaled N 2 O emissionse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
In 2017e0
Comparator
NTCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2017, DB+NI had similar soil yield‐scaled N 2 O emissions to NTC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB had the highest percentage grain yield increase over NTC.

Treatment
DBe0
Outcome
Percentage grain yield increasee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
NTCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage grain yield increase over NTC was highest for DB and DB+NI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI had the highest percentage grain yield increase over NTC.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
Percentage grain yield increasee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
NTCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage grain yield increase over NTC was highest for DB and DB+NI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB grain yield was 14 to 18% higher than SA in 2016.

Treatment
DBe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14 to 18%e0
Qualifier
in 2016e0
Comparator
SAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield in 2016 was 14 to 18% higher for DB and DB+NI than SA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1433 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI grain yield was 14 to 18% higher than SA in 2016.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14 to 18%e0
Qualifier
in 2016e0
Comparator
SAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield in 2016 was 14 to 18% higher for DB and DB+NI than SA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1433 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DB+NI had a 1.6% lower emission factor than surface application.

Treatment
Deep‐banded urea + nitrapyrine0
Outcome
emission factore0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.6%e0
Comparator
surface‐applied ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep‐banded urea + nitrapyrin had a 1.6% lower emission factor than surface‐applied urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1866 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep-banded urea had a 1.0% lower emission factor than surface application.

Treatment
Deep‐banded ureae0
Outcome
emission factore0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.0%e0
Comparator
surface‐applied ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep‐banded urea had a 1.0% lower emission factor than surface‐applied urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1867–1943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend DB+NI to reduce emissions and increase yield.

Treatment
DB+NIe0
Outcome
reducing cumulative soil N 2 O emissions and increasing grain yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DB+NI is an effective management strategy for reducing cumulative soil N 2 O emissions and increasing grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1569 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

nitrapyrin · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 37 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.