Abstract
Two Factorial field experiments on wheat (Var. Msr2) wereconducted during two successive seasons (2015/2016 and2016/2017).The factors involved gypsum application (none, 100%gypsum requirements) × organic fertilizer rate (none, 20 m3 fed-1) ×nitrogen fertilizer rates (none, 100 kg N fed-1) × zinc fertilizer rates(none, 5 kg Zn fed-1) × 4 replicates. The soils of the experimentallocations have been clay loam in texture and the mean values of someproperties were ECe = 6.40 dS.m-1, ESP = 18.11 % , pH = 8.30 whichreveals higher effects with salinity and sodicity.The important results could be summarized as follows:1- The addition of gypsum according to soil gypsum requirements (GR)prior wheat cultivation resulted in higher wheat yields as a result ofits ameliorative role in soil-pH; soil-EC; soil-ESP and subsequentlyincreasing the availability of some nutrients.2- Better wheat yields have been obtained by adding organic manure of20 m3 fed-1 compost, as a result of modifying various soil physicochemicalscharacteristics and subsequently increasing most nutrientsavailability.3- Nitrogen fertilization with the recommended rate of 100 kg N fed-1 (asAmmonium sulfate) led to higher wheat yields as compared to nonefertilizedtreatment.4- Zinc sulfate fertilization at rate of 5 kg Zn fed-1 for wheat led to betteryields; where that response is related to native Zn- unavailability dueto higher values of soil-pH and soil- ESP.5- The significant interaction of those variables on wheat yield and wheatgrains-N and Zn concentrations as well as protein content revealed thattheir use efficiencies have been affected with each other. The coadditionsof (GR)×organic manure × N-fertilizer ×Zn fertilizer were344 GENEDY et al.highly beneficial in improving N and Zn nutrition for wheat yield insuch soils.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The stated fertilizer treatment increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- gypsum according to soil gypsum requirements (GR)e0
- Outcome
- wheat yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The addition of gypsum according to soil gypsum requirements (GR)prior wheat cultivation resulted in higher wheat yields”
t0“WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
The stated fertilizer treatment increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- organic manure of20 m3 fed-1 composte0
- Outcome
- wheat yieldse0
- Direction
- Bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Better wheat yields have been obtained by adding organic manure of20 m3 fed-1 compost”
t0“WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
The stated fertilizer treatment increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen fertilization with the recommended rate of 100 kg N fed-1e0
- Outcome
- wheat yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- nonefertilizedtreatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen fertilization with the recommended rate of 100 kg N fed-1 (asAmmonium sulfate) led to higher wheat yields as compared to nonefertilizedtreatment”
t0“WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
The stated fertilizer treatment increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Zinc sulfate fertilization at rate of 5 kg Zn fed-1e0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zinc sulfate fertilization at rate of 5 kg Zn fed-1 for wheat led to betteryields”
t0“WHEAT CROP”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer factors interacted significantly for yield, grain nutrient concentrations, and protein content.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- those variablese0
- Outcome
- wheat yield and wheatgrains-N and Zn concentrations as well as protein contente0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The significant interaction of those variables on wheat yield and wheatgrains-N and Zn concentrations as well as protein content revealed thattheir use efficiencies have been affected with each other”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →gypsum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
169 papers more in this group
See all 173 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.