Paper · 2019 · Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition

Productivity and Quality of Fodder Oats ( Avena sativa L.) as influenced by Sowing Time, Cutting Schedules and Nitrogen Levels

S.S. Kadam; N.S. Solanki; Mohd. Arif; et al.

18
claims
58
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agronomy Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, (Rajasthan) during rabi seasons of 2016–17 and 2017–18 to study the effect of sowing time (25th October and 25th November), cutting schedules (cut at 50 DAS, cut at 60 DAS and cut at 70 DAS) and nitrogen levels (80, 100 and 120 kg ha−1) on productivity and quality of fodder oats. It was revealed that early sown crop on 25th October recorded significantly higher green (36.4 t ha−1) and dry (8.0 t ha−1) fodder yield as well as green (611 kg ha−1 day−1) and dry (134 kg ha−1 day−1) fodder production efficiency and quality parameters viz. ether extract (2.52%). Among different cutting schedules, cutting at 70 DAS recorded significantly higher green (37.8 t ha−1) and dry (8.3 t ha−1) fodder yield. However, cut at 50 DAS proved significantly better in terms of green (628.7kg ha−1 day1) and dry (137.0 kg ha−1 day−1) fodder production efficiency as well as quality parameters viz. crude protein (12.3%) and ether extract (2.56%). Application of 120kg N ha−1 gave significantly higher green (36.5 t ha−1), dry (8.0 t ha−1) fodderyield and green (613.5 t ha−1), dry (34.4 t ha−1) fodder production efficiency and quality parameters viz. crude protein (12.1%) and ether extract (2.53%). It is concluded that among sowing times 25th October, among cutting schedule 50 DAS and among nitrogen levels 120 kg N ha−1 is the best treatment for recoding maximum value of green and dry fodder production efficiency and ether extract.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing on 25th October gave significantly higher green fodder yield (36.4 t ha−1) than sowing on 25th November.

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
early sown crop on 25th Octobere0
Outcome
fodder yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
36.4 t ha−1e1
Comparator
25th Novembere2

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sown crop on 25th October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (36.4 t ha−1) and dry (8.0 t ha−1) fodder yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–511 · show in text ↑
e2

“25th November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing on 25th October gave significantly higher dry fodder yield (8.0 t ha−1) than sowing on 25th November.

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
early sown crop on 25th Octobere0
Outcome
fodder yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
8.0 t ha−1e1
Comparator
25th Novembere2

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sown crop on 25th October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (36.4 t ha−1) and dry (8.0 t ha−1) fodder yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–511 · show in text ↑
e2

“25th November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing on 25th October gave significantly higher green fodder production efficiency (611 kg ha−1 day−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
early sown crop on 25th Octobere0
Outcome
fodder production efficiencye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
611 kg ha−1 day−1e1
Comparator
25th Novembere2

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sown crop on 25th October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (611 kg ha−1 day−1) and dry (134 kg ha−1 day−1) fodder production efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“25th November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing on 25th October gave significantly higher dry fodder production efficiency (134 kg ha−1 day−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
early sown crop on 25th Octobere0
Outcome
fodder production efficiencye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
134 kg ha−1 day−1e1
Comparator
25th Novembere2

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sown crop on 25th October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (611 kg ha−1 day−1) and dry (134 kg ha−1 day−1) fodder production efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–605 · show in text ↑
e2

“25th November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing on 25th October gave significantly higher ether extract (2.52%).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
early sown crop on 25th Octobere0
Outcome
ether extracte1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
2.52%e1
Comparator
25th Novembere2

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sown crop on 25th October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“ether extract (2.52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–655 · show in text ↑
e2

“25th November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 70 DAS gave significantly higher green fodder yield (37.8 t ha−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
cutting at 70 DASe0
Outcome
fodder yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
37.8 t ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“cutting at 70 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (37.8 t ha−1) and dry (8.3 t ha−1) fodder yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 70 DAS gave significantly higher dry fodder yield (8.3 t ha−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
cutting at 70 DASe0
Outcome
fodder yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
8.3 t ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“cutting at 70 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (37.8 t ha−1) and dry (8.3 t ha−1) fodder yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 50 DAS was significantly better for green fodder production efficiency (628.7 kg ha−1 day−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
cut at 50 DASe0
Outcome
fodder production efficiencye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
628.7kg ha−1 day1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“cut at 50 DAS proved significantly better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (628.7kg ha−1 day1) and dry (137.0 kg ha−1 day−1) fodder production efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 50 DAS was significantly better for dry fodder production efficiency (137.0 kg ha−1 day−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
cut at 50 DASe0
Outcome
fodder production efficiencye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
137.0 kg ha−1 day−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“cut at 50 DAS proved significantly better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (628.7kg ha−1 day1) and dry (137.0 kg ha−1 day−1) fodder production efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 50 DAS was significantly better for crude protein (12.3%).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
cut at 50 DASe0
Outcome
crude proteine1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
12.3%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“cut at 50 DAS proved significantly better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“crude protein (12.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting at 50 DAS was significantly better for ether extract (2.56%).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
cut at 50 DASe0
Outcome
ether extracte1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
2.56%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“cut at 50 DAS proved significantly better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“ether extract (2.56%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg N ha−1 gave significantly higher green fodder yield (36.5 t ha−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
120kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
fodderyielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
36.5 t ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 120kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (36.5 t ha−1), dry (8.0 t ha−1) fodderyield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg N ha−1 gave significantly higher dry fodder yield (8.0 t ha−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
120kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
fodderyielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
8.0 t ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 120kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (36.5 t ha−1), dry (8.0 t ha−1) fodderyield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg N ha−1 gave significantly higher green fodder production efficiency (613.5 t ha−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
120kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
fodder production efficiencye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
613.5 t ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 120kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (613.5 t ha−1), dry (34.4 t ha−1) fodder production efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg N ha−1 gave significantly higher dry fodder production efficiency (34.4 t ha−1).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
120kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
fodder production efficiencye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
34.4 t ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 120kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (613.5 t ha−1), dry (34.4 t ha−1) fodder production efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg N ha−1 gave significantly higher crude protein (12.1%).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
120kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
crude proteine1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
12.1%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 120kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“crude protein (12.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

120 kg N ha−1 gave significantly higher ether extract (2.53%).

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Treatment
120kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
ether extracte1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
2.53%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 120kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“ether extract (2.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1279 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that sowing on 25th October, cutting at 50 DAS and 120 kg N ha−1 is the best treatment for fodder production efficiency and ether extract.

Taxon
Fodder Oatst0
Outcome
best treatmente0

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“among sowing times 25th October, among cutting schedule 50 DAS and among nitrogen levels 120 kg N ha−1 is the best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1426 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

pruning · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

sowing time · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 20 positive, 14 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.