Paper · 2004 · Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke))

Effect of environment on oat yield and grain quality

Glenn McDonald

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In recent years, little agronomic research has been conducted in Australia on oats. With grain markets becoming more aware of quality traits much can be gained by understanding the response of individual cultivars to growing conditions. The commercial release of new oat cultivars identified the need to determine under what conditions the best yields and quality could be obtained for each cultivar. Nine cultivars were grown in 12 delayed sowing experiments in the wheatbelt region of Western Australia from 1997-2000. Traits assessed included grain yield and quality. Delayed sowing, reduced grain yield, seed weight and groat oil content. The yield efficiency of converting post sowing rainfall (PSRF) into yield (yield/PSRF) increased with delayed sowing. Delayed sowing also increased groat beta-glucan content and screenings below a 2.0mm screen but decreased groat percent for most cultivars. Whilst grain density and groat protein were not affected by delayed sowing. As PSRF declined, yield, seed weight, groat percent and groat oil were reduced. Grain density increased as PSRF declined for all cultivars except one. Lower PSRF also resulted in higher screenings, and slightly higher groat protein and beta-glucan content. At lower PSRF levels there was more variation in yield, grain density and screenings because the timing of rain events became more critical at lower rainfall. The difference in groat oil content between the cultivars was much larger than the effect of PSRF. In the two trials that were waterlogged, yield was reduced by approximately 1.5-1.8 t/ha, grain density was 4 kg/hL lower and protein was reduced by 2%. Under waterlogging oil content increased and yield efficiency decreased with delayed sowing. Where weed competition was observed, yields were reduced by 1.5 t/ha, seed weight by 3-9mg and groat percent by 2-3%. These findings will provide growers and industry with a greater understanding of environmental effects on oat yield and quality for oats generally and for specific cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing reduced grain yield.

Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing, reduced grain yield, seed weight and groat oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing reduced seed weight.

Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing, reduced grain yield, seed weight and groat oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing reduced groat oil content.

Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
groat oil contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing, reduced grain yield, seed weight and groat oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield efficiency increased with delayed sowing.

Treatment
delayed sowinge0
Outcome
yield efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield efficiency of converting post sowing rainfall (PSRF) into yield (yield/PSRF) increased with delayed sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing increased groat beta-glucan content.

Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
groat beta-glucan contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing also increased groat beta-glucan content and screenings below a 2.0mm screen but decreased groat percent for most cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing increased screenings below a 2.0mm screen.

Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
screenings below a 2.0mm screene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing also increased groat beta-glucan content and screenings below a 2.0mm screen but decreased groat percent for most cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased groat percent.

Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
groat percente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing also increased groat beta-glucan content and screenings below a 2.0mm screen but decreased groat percent for most cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain density and groat protein were unaffected by delayed sowing.

Treatment
delayed sowinge0
Outcome
grain density and groat proteine0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain density and groat protein were not affected by delayed sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower PSRF was associated with reduced yield.

Treatment
PSRFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As PSRF declined, yield, seed weight, groat percent and groat oil were reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower PSRF was associated with reduced seed weight.

Treatment
PSRFe0
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As PSRF declined, yield, seed weight, groat percent and groat oil were reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower PSRF was associated with reduced groat percent.

Treatment
PSRFe0
Outcome
groat percente0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As PSRF declined, yield, seed weight, groat percent and groat oil were reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower PSRF was associated with reduced groat oil.

Treatment
PSRFe0
Outcome
groat oile0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As PSRF declined, yield, seed weight, groat percent and groat oil were reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain density increased as PSRF declined for all cultivars except one.

Treatment
PSRFe0
Outcome
Grain densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain density increased as PSRF declined for all cultivars except one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower PSRF was associated with higher screenings.

Treatment
PSRFe0
Outcome
screeningse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower PSRF also resulted in higher screenings, and slightly higher groat protein and beta-glucan content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower PSRF was associated with higher groat protein.

Treatment
PSRFe0
Outcome
groat proteine0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower PSRF also resulted in higher screenings, and slightly higher groat protein and beta-glucan content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower PSRF was associated with higher beta-glucan content.

Treatment
PSRFe0
Outcome
beta-glucan contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower PSRF also resulted in higher screenings, and slightly higher groat protein and beta-glucan content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar differences in groat oil content exceeded the PSRF effect.

Outcome
difference in groat oil contente0
Direction
much largere0
Comparator
effect of PSRFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in groat oil content between the cultivars was much larger than the effect of PSRF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced yield by 1.5-1.8 t/ha.

Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.5-1.8 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the two trials that were waterlogged, yield was reduced by approximately 1.5-1.8 t/ha, grain density was 4 kg/hL lower and protein was reduced by 2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging lower grain density by 4 kg/hL.

Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
grain densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4 kg/hLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the two trials that were waterlogged, yield was reduced by approximately 1.5-1.8 t/ha, grain density was 4 kg/hL lower and protein was reduced by 2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced protein by 2%.

Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the two trials that were waterlogged, yield was reduced by approximately 1.5-1.8 t/ha, grain density was 4 kg/hL lower and protein was reduced by 2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–28 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 20 positive, 14 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.