Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Agrobacterium-Mediated Gene Transient Overexpression and Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV)-Based Gene Silencing in Cassava

Hongqiu Zeng; Yanwei Xie; Guoyin Liu; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
67
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression and virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) are very useful in functional genomics in plants. However, whether these methods are effective in cassava (Manihot esculenta), one of the most important tropical crops, remains elusive. In this study, we used green fluorescent protein (GFP) and β-glucuronidase (GUS) as reporter genes in a transient expression assay. GFP or GUS could be detected in the infiltrated leaves at 2 days postinfiltration (dpi) and were evidenced by visual GFP and GUS assays, reverse-transcription PCR, and Western blot. In addition, phytoene desaturase (PDS) was used to show the silencing effect in a VIGS system. Both Agrobacterium GV3101 and AGL-1 with tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-MePDS-infiltrated distal leaves showed an albino phenotype at 20 dpi; in particular, the AGL-1-infiltrated plants showed an obvious albino area in the most distal leaves. Moreover, the silencing effect was validated by molecular identification. Notably, compared with the obvious cassava mosaic disease symptom infiltrated by African-cassava-mosaic-virus-based VIGS systems in previous studies, TRV-based VIGS-system-infiltrated cassava plants did not show obvious virus-induced disease symptoms, suggesting a significant advantage. Taken together, these methods could promote functional genomics in cassava.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GFP or GUS reporter expression could be detected in cassava infiltrated leaves at 2 days postinfiltration.

Outcome
GFP or GUS could be detectede1
Value
2 days postinfiltration (dpi)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective in cassava (Manihot esculenta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–209 · show in text ↑
e1

“GFP or GUS could be detected in the infiltrated leaves at 2 days postinfiltration (dpi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–489 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Agrobacterium GV3101 and AGL-1 carrying TRV-MePDS showed an albino phenotype in distal cassava leaves at 20 dpi.

Outcome
albino phenotypee2
Value
20 dpie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective in cassava (Manihot esculenta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both Agrobacterium GV3101 and AGL-1 with tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-MePDS-infiltrated distal leaves showed an albino phenotype at 20 dpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AGL-1-infiltrated cassava plants showed an obvious albino area in the most distal leaves.

Outcome
albino area in the most distal leavese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective in cassava (Manihot esculenta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–209 · show in text ↑
e3

“in particular, the AGL-1-infiltrated plants showed an obvious albino area in the most distal leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–916 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The silencing effect in cassava was validated by molecular identification.

Outcome
silencing effecte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective in cassava (Manihot esculenta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–209 · show in text ↑
e4

“Moreover, the silencing effect was validated by molecular identification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRV-based VIGS-infiltrated cassava plants showed no obvious virus-induced disease symptoms, unlike the obvious cassava mosaic symptoms of African-cassava-mosaic-virus-based VIGS in previous studies.

Treatment
TRV-based VIGS-systeme5
Outcome
virus-induced disease symptomse5
Direction
did not showe5
Comparator
African-cassava-mosaic-virus-based VIGS systemse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“TRV-based VIGS-system-infiltrated cassava plants did not show obvious virus-induced disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1242 · show in text ↑
e6

“compared with the obvious cassava mosaic disease symptom infiltrated by African-cassava-mosaic-virus-based VIGS systems in previous studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1140 · show in text ↑

loss of function · disease · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.