Paper · 2019 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Effect of FYM and neem based compost against wilt of Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Girish Patil; Abhilasha A. Lal; Kanhe Nivrutti; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The trial was conducted during the rabi season of 2017–18 on chick pea with a view to manage the disease in a sustainable manner by using eco-friendly approaches. There were nine treatments viz. T1 (FYM), T2 (FYM + Neem cake), T3(FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves), T4(Neem leaves), T5(Neem leaves + FYM), T6(Neem leaves + Neem cake), T7(Neem cake), including T8(Carbendazim) as treated check and T0(Control) as untreated check were evaluated against Fusarial wilt of chick pea under field conditions and RBD was used with three replications. Treatment containing composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3) showed minimum disease incidence (30.3%), maximum root length (14.4 cm), shoot length (45.29 cm) and yield (13 q/ha) however C: B ratio showed that Neem leaves + FYM was economical with C: B ratio of 1: 2.91.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composted FYM, neem cake and neem leaves produced minimum chick pea wilt incidence of 30.3%.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3)e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
30.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment containing composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3) showed minimum disease incidence (30.3%), maximum root length (14.4 cm), shoot length (45.29 cm) and yield (13 q/ha) however C: B ratio showed that Neem leaves + FYM was economical with C: B ratio of 1: 2.91.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of FYM and neem based compost against wilt of Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced maximum root length of 14.4 cm.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3)e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.4 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment containing composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3) showed minimum disease incidence (30.3%), maximum root length (14.4 cm), shoot length (45.29 cm) and yield (13 q/ha) however C: B ratio showed that Neem leaves + FYM was economical with C: B ratio of 1: 2.91.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of FYM and neem based compost against wilt of Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced maximum shoot length of 45.29 cm.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3)e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
45.29 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment containing composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3) showed minimum disease incidence (30.3%), maximum root length (14.4 cm), shoot length (45.29 cm) and yield (13 q/ha) however C: B ratio showed that Neem leaves + FYM was economical with C: B ratio of 1: 2.91.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of FYM and neem based compost against wilt of Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced maximum yield of 13 q/ha.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment containing composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3) showed minimum disease incidence (30.3%), maximum root length (14.4 cm), shoot length (45.29 cm) and yield (13 q/ha) however C: B ratio showed that Neem leaves + FYM was economical with C: B ratio of 1: 2.91.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of FYM and neem based compost against wilt of Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaves plus FYM was economical with a C:B ratio of 1:2.91.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Neem leaves + FYMe0
Outcome
C: B ratioe0
Value
1: 2.91e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment containing composted FYM + Neem cake + Neem leaves (T3) showed minimum disease incidence (30.3%), maximum root length (14.4 cm), shoot length (45.29 cm) and yield (13 q/ha) however C: B ratio showed that Neem leaves + FYM was economical with C: B ratio of 1: 2.91.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of FYM and neem based compost against wilt of Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Azadirachta indica · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Azadirachta indica · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

botanical · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

botanical · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

botanical · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 44 positive, 28 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.