Paper · 2016 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Impact of Bio-Fertilizer, Humic acid and compost Tea applications on Soil Properties and Egyptian Clover productivity under Saline Soil Conditions

Enshrah El-Maaz; Fatma Ismail

18
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during winter seasons of 2014/2015 and 2015/2016at Sahl El-Hossinia Agric. Res. Station, El-Sharkia – Governorate, Egypt to evaluate the effect of humic acid, compost tea and bio-fertilizer using two methods of application (foliar and soaking) on some chemical and physical soil properties and Egyptian clover (TrifoliumalexandrinumL.) var. Meskawy productivity under saline soil conditions. The soil pH and EC values decreased due to different treatments using soaking or foliar application.The lowest value of EC in soil reached (4.61 dSm-1)by applying humic acid as foliar application.The soil content of O.M increased in caseof bio-fertilizer, humic acid and compost tea compared with control using soaking or foliar application, however, a high increase was attained by humic acid foliar application.The CEC (cmolkg-1) valuewas affected by different fertilizer sources using soaking or foliar application. The high mean value of CEC was 41.42cmolkg-1in case of humic acid foliar application compared with other treatments and control. The highest values of field capacity and available water were found in case of humic acid foliar application compared to other treatments and control using soaking or foliar application. The values of soil bulk density of soil profiles treated by all treatments were relatively low compared to those of control, whereas the maximum decrease exists in soil treated byhumic acid foliar application compared to other treatments and control using soaking or foliar application. Adding humic acid as foliar application increased the soil total porosity values compared to other treatments and control. Data showed that the values of drainable pores (DP) and water holding pores (WHP) were higher than the other pores in different treatments. The highest diameters of dry aggregates were affected by humic acid foliar application compared to other treatments and control. The high values of total stable aggregates were observed incase of humic acid foliar application. Applying bio-fertilizer; humic acid and compost tea on seeds using soaking or foliar application increases significantly the clover yield and yield components except the interaction between treatments and methods of application. Humic acid with foliar application gave the highest values of Egyptian clover yield and yield components as compared by other treatments. The obtained data indicate that the Egyptian clover yield was clearly affected by all treatments under saline soil conditions. The beneficial effects of all treatments compared with control using soaking or foliar application on Egyptian clover yield could be arranged as follows according to the increases in dry yield (ton/fed)of clover: Humic acid > compost tea> Bio-fertilizer > control, for soaked application and humic acid > Bio-fertilizer > compost tea > control, for foliar application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different treatments decreased soil pH and EC under soaking or foliar application.

Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
soil pH and EC valuese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The soil pH and EC values decreased due to different treatments using soaking or foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid produced the lowest soil EC, 4.61 dSm-1.

Treatment
humic acid as foliar applicatione0
Outcome
EC in soile0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.61 dSm-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest value of EC in soil reached (4.61 dSm-1)by applying humic acid as foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizer increased soil organic matter compared with control under soaking or foliar application.

Treatment
bio-fertilizere0
Outcome
soil content of O.Me0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The soil content of O.M increased in caseof bio-fertilizer, humic acid and compost tea compared with control using soaking or foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased soil organic matter compared with control, particularly with foliar application.

Treatment
humic acide0
Outcome
soil content of O.Me0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
a high increase was attained by humic acid foliar applicatione0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The soil content of O.M increased in caseof bio-fertilizer, humic acid and compost tea compared with control using soaking or foliar application, however, a high increase was attained by humic acid foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost tea increased soil organic matter compared with control under soaking or foliar application.

Treatment
compost teae0
Outcome
soil content of O.Me0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The soil content of O.M increased in caseof bio-fertilizer, humic acid and compost tea compared with control using soaking or foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid gave a high mean CEC of 41.42cmolkg-1 compared with other treatments and control.

Treatment
humic acid foliar applicatione0
Outcome
CECe0
Direction
highe0
Value
41.42cmolkg-1e0
Comparator
other treatments and controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The high mean value of CEC was 41.42cmolkg-1in case of humic acid foliar application compared with other treatments and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid gave the highest field capacity and available water relative to other treatments and control.

Treatment
humic acid foliar applicatione0
Outcome
field capacity and available watere0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatments and controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of field capacity and available water were found in case of humic acid foliar application compared to other treatments and control using soaking or foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments lowered soil bulk density relative to control, with the maximum decrease under foliar humic acid.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
relatively lowe0
Qualifier
the maximum decrease exists in soil treated byhumic acid foliar applicatione0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The values of soil bulk density of soil profiles treated by all treatments were relatively low compared to those of control, whereas the maximum decrease exists in soil treated byhumic acid foliar application compared to other treatments and control using soaking or foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid increased soil total porosity relative to other treatments and control.

Treatment
humic acid as foliar applicatione0
Outcome
soil total porosity valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other treatments and controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Adding humic acid as foliar application increased the soil total porosity values compared to other treatments and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drainable and water holding pores had higher values than other pores across treatments.

Outcome
drainable pores (DP) and water holding pores (WHP)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other porese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Data showed that the values of drainable pores (DP) and water holding pores (WHP) were higher than the other pores in different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid affected the highest dry aggregate diameters compared with other treatments and control.

Treatment
humic acid foliar applicatione0
Outcome
diameters of dry aggregatese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatments and controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest diameters of dry aggregates were affected by humic acid foliar application compared to other treatments and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid produced high total stable aggregate values.

Treatment
humic acid foliar applicatione0
Outcome
total stable aggregatese0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The high values of total stable aggregates were observed incase of humic acid foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1943–2040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizer significantly increased clover yield and yield components with soaking or foliar application, except for the treatment-by-method interaction.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Treatment
bio-fertilizere0
Outcome
clover yield and yield componentse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
except the interaction between treatments and methods of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying bio-fertilizer; humic acid and compost tea on seeds using soaking or foliar application increases significantly the clover yield and yield components except the interaction between treatments and methods of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid significantly increased clover yield and yield components with soaking or foliar application, except for the treatment-by-method interaction.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Treatment
humic acide0
Outcome
clover yield and yield componentse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
except the interaction between treatments and methods of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying bio-fertilizer; humic acid and compost tea on seeds using soaking or foliar application increases significantly the clover yield and yield components except the interaction between treatments and methods of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost tea significantly increased clover yield and yield components with soaking or foliar application, except for the treatment-by-method interaction.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Treatment
compost teae0
Outcome
clover yield and yield componentse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
except the interaction between treatments and methods of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying bio-fertilizer; humic acid and compost tea on seeds using soaking or foliar application increases significantly the clover yield and yield components except the interaction between treatments and methods of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid gave the highest Egyptian clover yield and yield components compared with other treatments.

Taxon
Egyptian clovere0
Treatment
Humic acid with foliar applicatione0
Outcome
Egyptian clover yield and yield componentse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid with foliar application gave the highest values of Egyptian clover yield and yield components as compared by other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2270–2407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaked treatments ranked humic acid above compost tea, bio-fertilizer and control for clover dry yield.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Outcome
dry yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
Humic acid > compost tea> Bio-fertilizer > control, for soaked applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“according to the increases in dry yield (ton/fed)of clover: Humic acid > compost tea> Bio-fertilizer > control, for soaked application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2688–2822 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments ranked humic acid above bio-fertilizer, compost tea and control for clover dry yield.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Outcome
dry yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
humic acid > Bio-fertilizer > compost tea > control, for foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“according to the increases in dry yield (ton/fed)of clover: Humic acid > compost tea> Bio-fertilizer > control, for soaked application and humic acid > Bio-fertilizer > compost tea > control, for foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2688–2903 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · TrifoliumResults differ

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · TrifoliumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · yield · TrifoliumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · soil: physics · TrifoliumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · TrifoliumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · yield · TrifoliumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.