Abstract
Abstract Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) rates were monitored for 2 years in pastures receiving 100–150 kg N/ha per year as urea and in a control pasture. Applying 100 kg of fertiliser N in 2 applications reduced annual nitrogen fixation from 100 kg N/ha to 70 kg N/ha. Clover yields were reduced less — on average by 8% when only 100 kg N was applied preceding and during measurement, and by 17% averaged over all farmlets. Hence the major effect of nitrogen fertiliser on clovers was to substitute mineral nitrogen for nitrogen fixation. There was a high level of utilisation of the pastures, which would have minimised the reduction in clover yields expected from increased grass competition. An annual nitrogen fertiliser input of 150 kg N/ha reduced clover yields the following summer more than did an input of 100 kg N/ha. Nitrogen fixation was similar in both nitrogen treatments, because of an increase in nitrogen fixation per unit clover grown at the higher nitrogen level.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 100 kg of fertiliser N in 2 applications reduced annual nitrogen fixation from 100 kg N/ha to 70 kg N/ha relative to a control pasture.
- Treatment
- Applying 100 kg of fertiliser N in 2 applicationse0
- Outcome
- annual nitrogen fixatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- from 100 kg N/ha to 70 kg N/hae0
- Comparator
- control pasturee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Applying 100 kg of fertiliser N in 2 applications reduced annual nitrogen fixation from 100 kg N/ha to 70 kg N/ha”
e1“and in a control pasture”
t0“nitrogen fertiliser on clover”
Claim · model-written summary
Clover yields were reduced on average by 8% when only 100 kg N was applied preceding and during measurement.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Clover yields were reduced less — on average by 8% when only 100 kg N was applied preceding and during measurement”
Claim · model-written summary
Clover yields were reduced by 17% averaged over all farmlets.
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilisert0
- Outcome
- Clover yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 17%e0
- Qualifier
- averaged over all farmletse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Clover yields were reduced less — on average by 8% when only 100 kg N was applied preceding and during measurement, and by 17% averaged over all farmlets”
t0“nitrogen fertiliser on clover”
Claim · model-written summary
An annual nitrogen fertiliser input of 150 kg N/ha reduced clover yields the following summer more than an input of 100 kg N/ha.
- Treatment
- annual nitrogen fertiliser input of 150 kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- clover yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- the following summere0
- Comparator
- input of 100 kg N/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“An annual nitrogen fertiliser input of 150 kg N/ha reduced clover yields the following summer more than did an input of 100 kg N/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fixation was similar in the two nitrogen treatments.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen fixation was similar in both nitrogen treatments”
t0“nitrogen fertiliser on clover”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fixation per unit clover grown increased at the higher nitrogen level, which explains the similar fixation in both treatments.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“because of an increase in nitrogen fixation per unit clover grown at the higher nitrogen level”
Claim · model-written summary
The major effect of nitrogen fertiliser on clovers was to substitute mineral nitrogen for nitrogen fixation.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Hence the major effect of nitrogen fertiliser on clovers was to substitute mineral nitrogen for nitrogen fixation”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · TrifoliumResults differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · TrifoliumPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nitrogen · symbiosis · TrifoliumPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →nitrogen · yield · TrifoliumPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.