Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Phytopathology

Potential of Non-Fumigant Nematicides at Different Formulations Against Southern Root-knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on Tomato Plants

Mohamed S. Khalil; Abdulqawi A. A. Alqadasi

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Currently, plant parasitic nematodes (PPN) especially root knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp. have been found involved in the global losses of tomato crops. The most employed tactic for managing PPN in Africa is non-fumigant nematicides. Recently, in Egypt abamectin was recorded as a new tool to control PPN. Thus, two pot experiments were conducted to evaluate the potential of abamectin and certain non-fumigant nematicides namely; oxamyl and ethoprophos at two different formulations (granular and liquid) against southern root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on tomato plants under greenhouse conditions. Results revealed the granular formulations of ethoprophos and oxamyl, in addition to abamectin, showed the same significance (P≤0.05) in suppressing tomato soil population and root galls of M. incognita, during both experiments. However, liquid formulations of ethoprophos and oxamyl gave relatively less decreasing in soil population and root galls. On the other hand, all applied treatments improved plant growth criteria ranging from 36.92 to 126.44% in shoot dry weight and from 31.25 to 137.50% in root dry weight for both experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular ethoprophos suppressed M. incognita soil populations and root galls.

Treatment
ethoprophose0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
tomato soil population and root galls of M. incognitae0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“granular formulations of ethoprophos and oxamyl, in addition to abamectin, showed the same significance (P≤0.05) in suppressing tomato soil population and root galls of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular oxamyl suppressed M. incognita soil populations and root galls.

Treatment
oxamyle0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
tomato soil population and root galls of M. incognitae0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“granular formulations of ethoprophos and oxamyl, in addition to abamectin, showed the same significance (P≤0.05) in suppressing tomato soil population and root galls of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Abamectin suppressed M. incognita soil populations and root galls.

Treatment
abamectine0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
tomato soil population and root galls of M. incognitae0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“granular formulations of ethoprophos and oxamyl, in addition to abamectin, showed the same significance (P≤0.05) in suppressing tomato soil population and root galls of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid ethoprophos gave relatively less reduction in soil population and root galls.

Treatment
ethoprophose0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
soil population and root gallse0
Direction
less decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“liquid formulations of ethoprophos and oxamyl gave relatively less decreasing in soil population and root galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–140 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid oxamyl gave relatively less reduction in soil population and root galls.

Treatment
oxamyle0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
soil population and root gallse0
Direction
less decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“liquid formulations of ethoprophos and oxamyl gave relatively less decreasing in soil population and root galls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–140 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied treatments improved tomato shoot dry weight by 36.92 to 126.44%.

Treatment
all applied treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
36.92 to 126.44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all applied treatments improved plant growth criteria ranging from 36.92 to 126.44% in shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied treatments improved tomato root dry weight by 31.25 to 137.50%.

Treatment
all applied treatmentst1
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
improvedt1
Value
31.25 to 137.50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 31.25 to 137.50% in root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–140 · show in text ↑
t1

“all applied treatments improved plant growth criteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1037 · show in text ↑

oxamyl · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

ethoprophos · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

abamectin · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.