Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Biofertilizers under Drip Fertigation System on NPK Uptake and Yield Performance of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

K. Shravani; S. Triveni; P. C. Latha; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at water technology centre fields, college farm, College of Agriculture, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana during kharif 2016 – 2017 with one of the objective of nutrient uptake and yield performance of Greengram, variety (MGG – 295) under Drip fertigation system. The experiment was laid out in Randomizerd block design with three replications. Use of carrier based inoculum for crop growth and yield is wide practice among the conventional agriculture. Precision farming is a site specific management approach whereas the conventional practice is a uniform fertilizer application. Carrier based inoculum is not suitable for precision farming system due to clogging effect. Hence the liquid bioinoculants viz., Rhizobium and PSB were used under drip fertigation system to evaluate the yield performance and NPK uptake of greengram. The result suggested the positive influence of 100% RDF of NPK + Rhizobium (LB) and PSB (LB) under drip fertigation the flow rate was 2 lit hr-1 on delivery of microbial inoculants Rhizobium (8.38 log no. of cells ml-1) and PSB (8.15 log no. of cells ml-1) were increased the NPK uptake and 23.93 % yield over conventional method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation with 100% RDF of NPK plus liquid Rhizobium and PSB increased NPK uptake in greengram compared with the conventional method.

Treatment
100% RDF of NPK + Rhizobium (LB) and PSB (LB) under drip fertigatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
NPK uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
conventional methode1
Setting
water technology centre fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The result suggested the positive influence of 100% RDF of NPK + Rhizobium (LB) and PSB (LB) under drip fertigation the flow rate was 2 lit hr-1 on delivery of microbial inoculants Rhizobium (8.38 log no. of cells ml-1) and PSB (8.15 log no. of cells ml-1) were increased the NPK uptake and 23.93 % yield over conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1203 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted at water technology centre fields, college farm, College of Agriculture, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium delivered through the drip system was 8.38 log cells per ml.

Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
delivery of microbial inoculantse1
Value
8.38 log no. of cells ml-1e1
Setting
water technology centre fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The result suggested the positive influence of 100% RDF of NPK + Rhizobium (LB) and PSB (LB) under drip fertigation the flow rate was 2 lit hr-1 on delivery of microbial inoculants Rhizobium (8.38 log no. of cells ml-1) and PSB (8.15 log no. of cells ml-1) were increased the NPK uptake and 23.93 % yield over conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1203 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted at water technology centre fields, college farm, College of Agriculture, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB delivered through the drip system was 8.15 log cells per ml.

Interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
delivery of microbial inoculantse1
Value
8.15 log no. of cells ml-1e1
Setting
water technology centre fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The result suggested the positive influence of 100% RDF of NPK + Rhizobium (LB) and PSB (LB) under drip fertigation the flow rate was 2 lit hr-1 on delivery of microbial inoculants Rhizobium (8.38 log no. of cells ml-1) and PSB (8.15 log no. of cells ml-1) were increased the NPK uptake and 23.93 % yield over conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1203 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted at water technology centre fields, college farm, College of Agriculture, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation with biofertilizers increased greengram yield by 23.93% over the conventional method.

Treatment
100% RDF of NPK + Rhizobium (LB) and PSB (LB) under drip fertigatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
23.93 %e1
Comparator
conventional methode1
Setting
water technology centre fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The result suggested the positive influence of 100% RDF of NPK + Rhizobium (LB) and PSB (LB) under drip fertigation the flow rate was 2 lit hr-1 on delivery of microbial inoculants Rhizobium (8.38 log no. of cells ml-1) and PSB (8.15 log no. of cells ml-1) were increased the NPK uptake and 23.93 % yield over conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1203 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted at water technology centre fields, college farm, College of Agriculture, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.