Abstract
There were no apparent herbicide-insecticide or herbicide-fungicide interactions when two pesticides were used on peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea L.) in the greenhouse. In field studies, O,O-diethyl s -(2-(ethylthio)-ethyl)-phosphorodithioate (disulfoton), O,O-diethyl s-((ethylthio)-methyl)-phosphorodithioate (phorate), 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (dibromochloropropane), and pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) had little influence on phytotoxicity of the herbicides 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (chloramben) and α,α,α -trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine (trifluralin) to peanuts. There was no phytotoxic effect or yield reduction as a result of application of chloramben or trifluralin combined with the use of fungicide-treated seed in the field. However, in the greenhouse, top growth of the fungicide-treated checks was greater than that of the herbicide-fungicide seed treatments. Dibromochloropropane nematocide alone was injurious to peanut seedlings grown in the greenhouse, but the application of a herbicide did not increase the injury.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse herbicide and insecticide combinations showed no apparent interaction.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Outcome
- herbicide-insecticidee0
- Direction
- no apparente0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were no apparent herbicide-insecticide or herbicide-fungicide interactions when two pesticides were used on peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea L.) in the greenhouse.”
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse herbicide and fungicide combinations showed no apparent interaction.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
- Outcome
- herbicide-fungicide interactionse0
- Direction
- no apparente0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were no apparent herbicide-insecticide or herbicide-fungicide interactions when two pesticides were used on peanuts ( Arachis hypogaea L.) in the greenhouse.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field insecticides, nematocide and fungicide had little influence on herbicide phytotoxicity in peanuts.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- disulfotone0
- Outcome
- phytotoxicitye0
- Direction
- little influencee0
- Setting
- field studiese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In field studies, O,O-diethyl s -(2-(ethylthio)-ethyl)-phosphorodithioate (disulfoton), O,O-diethyl s-((ethylthio)-methyl)-phosphorodithioate (phorate), 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (dibromochloropropane), and pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) had little influence on phytotoxicity of the herbicides 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (chloramben) and α,α,α -trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine (trifluralin) to peanuts.”
Claim · model-written summary
Field combinations of herbicide and fungicide-treated seed did not cause peanut phytotoxicity.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- chloramben or trifluralin combined with the use of fungicide-treated seede0
- Outcome
- phytotoxic effecte0
- Direction
- noe0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no phytotoxic effect or yield reduction as a result of application of chloramben or trifluralin combined with the use of fungicide-treated seed in the field.”
e1“to peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Field combinations of herbicide and fungicide-treated seed did not reduce peanut yield.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- chloramben or trifluralin combined with the use of fungicide-treated seede0
- Outcome
- yield reductione0
- Direction
- noe0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no phytotoxic effect or yield reduction as a result of application of chloramben or trifluralin combined with the use of fungicide-treated seed in the field.”
e1“to peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide-treated checks had greater top growth than herbicide-fungicide seed treatments in greenhouse.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- fungicide-treated checkse0
- Outcome
- top growthe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- herbicide-fungicide seed treatmentse0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the greenhouse, top growth of the fungicide-treated checks was greater than that of the herbicide-fungicide seed treatments.”
e1“to peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
Dibromochloropropane alone injured greenhouse peanut seedlings.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Dibromochloropropane nematocide alonee0
- Outcome
- injurious to peanut seedlingse0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dibromochloropropane nematocide alone was injurious to peanut seedlings grown in the greenhouse”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding herbicide did not increase nematocide injury to peanut seedlings.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- application of a herbicidee0
- Outcome
- injurye0
- Direction
- did not increasee0
- Comparator
- Dibromochloropropane nematocide alonee0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dibromochloropropane nematocide alone was injurious to peanut seedlings grown in the greenhouse, but the application of a herbicide did not increase the injury.”
The same questions in other papers
disulfoton · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
trifluralin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
fungicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →herbicide · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →fungicide · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fungicide · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.