Paper · 2002 · Peanut Science

Interaction of Prohexadione Calcium with Agrichemicals Applied to Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

J. B. Beam; D. L. Jordan; A. C. York; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A variety of pesticides and foliar fertilizers are applied to emerged peanut. Defining interactions among these agrichemicals is important when formulating pest management and production strategies. Research was conducted in North Carolina during 1999 and 2000 to evaluate interactions among prohexadione calcium at 140 g ai/ha applied with various commercially available fungicides, insecticides, herbicides, and foliar fertilizers. Agrichemical mixtures were applied when peanut vines reached 50% row closure. Prohexadione calcium alone was applied approximately 2 wk later. Twenty-eight percent urea ammonium nitrate was included with prohexadione calcium. In a second set of experiments, control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) by imazapic plus 2,4-DB, acifluorfen plus bentazon plus 2, 4-DB, bentazon plus 2, 4-DB, acifluorfen plus 2,4-DB, pyridate plus 2,4-DB, and 2,4-DB applied alone or with prohexadione calcium were evaluated. Large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.] control by sethoxydim and clethodim alone or with prohexadione calcium was evaluated also. Fungicides, insecticides, and foliar fertilizers did not affect efficacy of prohexadione calcium with respect to visible injury to peanut, row visibility, or maintenance of short stems. Slightly higher injury was noted when acifluorfen, acifluorfen plus bentazon, bentazon, and pyridate were applied with prohexadione calcium. Minor increases in pitted morningglory control and peanut injury were noted when herbicides were applied with prohexadione calcium, most likely due to presence of urea ammonium nitrate. However, prohexadione calcium did not affect large crabgrass control by sethoxydim or clethodim. Collectively, these data suggest that prohexadione calcium and the majority of agrichemicals applied to peanut are compatible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides, insecticides and foliar fertilizers did not affect prohexadione calcium efficacy for peanut injury, row visibility or short stems.

Treatment
Fungicides, insecticides, and foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
efficacy of prohexadione calcium with respect to visible injury to peanut, row visibility, or maintenance of short stemse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicides, insecticides, and foliar fertilizers did not affect efficacy of prohexadione calcium with respect to visible injury to peanut, row visibility, or maintenance of short stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acifluorfen with prohexadione calcium produced slightly higher peanut injury.

Treatment
acifluorfene0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slightly higher injury was noted when acifluorfen, acifluorfen plus bentazon, bentazon, and pyridate were applied with prohexadione calcium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acifluorfen plus bentazon with prohexadione calcium produced slightly higher peanut injury.

Treatment
acifluorfen plus bentazone0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slightly higher injury was noted when acifluorfen, acifluorfen plus bentazon, bentazon, and pyridate were applied with prohexadione calcium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon with prohexadione calcium produced slightly higher peanut injury.

Treatment
bentazone0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slightly higher injury was noted when acifluorfen, acifluorfen plus bentazon, bentazon, and pyridate were applied with prohexadione calcium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridate with prohexadione calcium produced slightly higher peanut injury.

Treatment
pyridatee0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slightly higher injury was noted when acifluorfen, acifluorfen plus bentazon, bentazon, and pyridate were applied with prohexadione calcium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides with prohexadione calcium slightly increased pitted morningglory control.

Treatment
herbicides were applied with prohexadione calciume0
Interactor
pitted morningglorye0weed
Outcome
pitted morningglory controle0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minor increases in pitted morningglory control and peanut injury were noted when herbicides were applied with prohexadione calcium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides with prohexadione calcium slightly increased peanut injury.

Treatment
herbicides were applied with prohexadione calciume0
Outcome
peanut injurye0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minor increases in pitted morningglory control and peanut injury were noted when herbicides were applied with prohexadione calcium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione calcium did not affect large crabgrass control by sethoxydim.

Treatment
prohexadione calciume0
Interactor
large crabgrasse0weed
Outcome
large crabgrass controle0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
sethoxydime0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prohexadione calcium did not affect large crabgrass control by sethoxydim or clethodim.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione calcium did not affect large crabgrass control by clethodim.

Treatment
prohexadione calciume0
Interactor
large crabgrasse0weed
Outcome
large crabgrass controle0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
clethodime0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prohexadione calcium did not affect large crabgrass control by sethoxydim or clethodim.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that prohexadione calcium is compatible with most agrichemicals applied to peanut.

Outcome
prohexadione calcium and the majority of agrichemicals applied to peanut are compatiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prohexadione calcium and the majority of agrichemicals applied to peanut are compatible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1880 · show in text ↑

bentazone · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

prohexadione · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pyridate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

application · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 4 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

herbicide · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.