Abstract
Responses of weeds and sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.) to postemergence treatments of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate m -methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) and two analogues were evaluated in six field studies. Phenmedipham at 1.7 kg/ha controlled foxtail millet ( Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.) and kochia ( Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.) better than 2.2 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate and ethyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate. Pigweed ( Amaranthus spp.) was controlled better by the analogues at 1.1 kg/ha than by phenmedipham. The foliar growth of sugarbeets was generally suppressed more by the analogues than by phenmedipham, but injury was not considered detrimental at 1.1 kg/ha. Yield of sugarbeet roots and sugar was reduced by 7% or less by phenmedipham at rates of 1.1 to 4.5 kg/ha, but these yield reductions were associated primarily with the failure of phenmedipham to completely control all weeds for 5 to 9 weeks after treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Phenmedipham controlled foxtail millet better than the two analogues.
- Taxon
- Sugarbeets
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Phenmedipham at 1.7 kg/hae0
- Interactor
- Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.
Setaria italicae0weed - Outcome
- controlled foxtail millete0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- 2.2 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate and ethyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phenmedipham at 1.7 kg/ha controlled foxtail millet ( Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.) and kochia ( Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.) better than 2.2 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate and ethyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenmedipham controlled kochia better than the two analogues.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Phenmedipham at 1.7 kg/hae0
- Interactor
- Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.
Bassia scopariae0weed - Outcome
- kochiae0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- 2.2 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate and ethyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phenmedipham at 1.7 kg/ha controlled foxtail millet ( Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.) and kochia ( Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.) better than 2.2 kg/ha of methyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate and ethyl m -hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
The analogues controlled pigweed better than phenmedipham.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- the analogues at 1.1 kg/hae0
- Interactor
- Amaranthus spp.
_with_green_foliage%2C_photographed_in_Tamil_Nadu%2C_India.jpg?width=60)
Amaranthuse0weed - Outcome
- Pigweed ( Amaranthus spp.) was controllede0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- phenmediphame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_with_green_foliage%2C_photographed_in_Tamil_Nadu%2C_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Pigweed ( Amaranthus spp.) was controlled better by the analogues at 1.1 kg/ha than by phenmedipham.”
t0“Sugarbeets”
Claim · model-written summary
Analogues suppressed sugarbeet foliar growth more than phenmedipham.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- the analoguese0
- Outcome
- foliar growthe0
- Direction
- suppressed moree0
- Qualifier
- injury was not considered detrimental at 1.1 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- phenmediphame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The foliar growth of sugarbeets was generally suppressed more by the analogues than by phenmedipham, but injury was not considered detrimental at 1.1 kg/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenmedipham reduced sugarbeet root yield by no more than 7%.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- phenmedipham at rates of 1.1 to 4.5 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- Yield of sugarbeet rootse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 7% or lesse0
- Qualifier
- failure of phenmedipham to completely control all weeds for 5 to 9 weeks after treatmente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield of sugarbeet roots and sugar was reduced by 7% or less by phenmedipham at rates of 1.1 to 4.5 kg/ha, but these yield reductions were associated primarily with the failure of phenmedipham to completely control all weeds for 5 to 9 weeks after treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenmedipham reduced sugar yield by no more than 7%.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- phenmedipham at rates of 1.1 to 4.5 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- sugare0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 7% or lesse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield of sugarbeet roots and sugar was reduced by 7% or less by phenmedipham at rates of 1.1 to 4.5 kg/ha, but these yield reductions were associated primarily with the failure of phenmedipham to completely control all weeds for 5 to 9 weeks after treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield reductions were primarily associated with incomplete weed control.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- phenmediphame0
- Outcome
- yield reductionse0
- Qualifier
- failure of phenmedipham to completely control all weeds for 5 to 9 weeks after treatmente0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these yield reductions were associated primarily with the failure of phenmedipham to completely control all weeds for 5 to 9 weeks after treatment”
t0“Sugarbeets”
The same questions in other papers
phenmedipham · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →phenmedipham · Setaria italica · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.