Abstract
Giant foxtail density in corn was greater under no-till and chisel plow tillage systems than conventional or till plant. Giant foxtail density in no-till was 1400 shoots/m 2 56 days after corn planting compared to 170 under conventional tillage. Velvedeaf density was greater under conventional tillage than all other tillage systems. Velvetleaf density was 120 plants/m 2 56 days after corn planting under conventional tillage compared to 20 in no-till. Control of giant foxtail was often less under no-till or chisel plow conditions than conventional or till plant with the same herbicide treatment. Giant foxtail control with metolachlor treatments was affected less by tillage than similar treatments containing alachlor. Velvedeaf control was less with conventional tillage than other tillage systems when less than 1.7 kg/ha of atrazine was applied. Corn injury was not influenced by tillage systems. Corn yield was not affected by tillage systems under weed-free conditions. Several herbicide treatments resulted in corn yield similar to the weed-free under conventional tillage, but no herbicide treatment produced corn yield similar to the weed-free control under no-till conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Giant foxtail density in corn was greater under no-till and chisel plow than conventional or till plant systems.
- Treatment
- no-till and chisel plow tillage systemse0
- Interactor
- Giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- Giant foxtail densitye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- conventional or till plante0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Giant foxtail density in corn was greater under no-till and chisel plow tillage systems than conventional or till plant.”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
Giant foxtail density 56 days after planting was 1400 shoots/m 2 under no-till versus 170 under conventional tillage.
- Treatment
- no-tille0
- Interactor
- Giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- Giant foxtail densitye0
- Value
- 1400 shoots/m 2e0
- Qualifier
- 56 days after corn plantinge0
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Giant foxtail density in no-till was 1400 shoots/m 2 56 days after corn planting compared to 170 under conventional tillage.”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
Velvetleaf density was greater under conventional tillage than all other systems.
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Interactor
- Velvetleaf
Abutilon theophrastit0weed - Outcome
- Velvedeaf densitye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- all other tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Velvedeaf density was greater under conventional tillage than all other tillage systems.”
t0“Velvetleaf”
t1“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
Velvetleaf density was 120 plants/m 2 under conventional tillage versus 20 in no-till.
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Interactor
- VelvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
- Outcome
- Velvetleaf densitye0
- Value
- 120 plants/m 2e0
- Comparator
- no-tille0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Velvetleaf density was 120 plants/m 2 56 days after corn planting under conventional tillage compared to 20 in no-till.”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
Giant foxtail control was often less under no-till or chisel plow than conventional or till plant with the same herbicide.
- Treatment
- no-till or chisel plow conditionse0
- Interactor
- giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- Control of giant foxtaile0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- conventional or till plante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Control of giant foxtail was often less under no-till or chisel plow conditions than conventional or till plant with the same herbicide treatment.”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
Metolachlor control of giant foxtail was affected less by tillage than alachlor control.
- Treatment
- metolachlor treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- Giant foxtail controle0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- similar treatments containing alachlore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Giant foxtail control with metolachlor treatments was affected less by tillage than similar treatments containing alachlor.”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
With less than 1.7 kg/ha atrazine, velvetleaf control was lower under conventional than other tillage systems.
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Interactor
- VelvetleafAbutilon theophrastit1weed
- Outcome
- Velvedeaf controle0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Qualifier
- less than 1.7 kg/ha of atrazinee0
- Comparator
- other tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Velvedeaf control was less with conventional tillage than other tillage systems when less than 1.7 kg/ha of atrazine was applied.”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
t1“Velvetleaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn injury was not influenced by tillage systems.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Corn injury was not influenced by tillage systems.”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
Under weed-free conditions, tillage systems did not affect corn yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Corn yield was not affected by tillage systems under weed-free conditions.”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
Under conventional tillage, several herbicide treatments gave corn yield similar to weed-free conditions.
- Treatment
- Several herbicide treatmentse0
- Outcome
- corn yielde0
- Direction
- similare0
- Qualifier
- conventional tillagee0
- Comparator
- weed-freee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Several herbicide treatments resulted in corn yield similar to the weed-free under conventional tillage”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
Claim · model-written summary
Under no-till, no herbicide treatment produced corn yield similar to the weed-free control.
- Treatment
- herbicide treatmente0
- Outcome
- corn yielde0
- Qualifier
- no-till conditionse0
- Comparator
- weed-free controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no herbicide treatment produced corn yield similar to the weed-free control under no-till conditions”
t0“Corn,Zea mays”
The same questions in other papers
metolachlor · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →tillage · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
tillage · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →tillage · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
647 papers more in this group
See all 651 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →tillage · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.