Abstract
The experiments were set on lime-coated chernozem soil in 2013 and in 2014, in our study four hybrids were included with different FAO number. We studied the effect of NPK fertilization and row spacing on the yield. The fertilizer doses were based on a 25-year longterm experiment. Compared to control, the N40 +PK treatment has also achieved a significant yield increase, although some hybrids responsed with yield loss to the increasing fertilizer doses; this effect was observed especially in 2014. The majority of hybrids reached higher yields in both years using the 50 cm row spacing. The water release of hybrids was measured weekly during the maturation, at the same time points. The rainy September slowed ripening and the water release of the hybrids in 2013, so the grain wet content at harvest showed higher values. The moisture contents were increased for some hybrids, in spite of the positive and favorable dynamic of water loss.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
N40 +PK increased maize yield significantly relative to control.
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to control, the N40 +PK treatment has also achieved a significant yield increase”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Some maize hybrids lost yield with increasing fertilizer doses, especially in 2014.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“some hybrids responsed with yield loss to the increasing fertilizer doses; this effect was observed especially in 2014”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Most maize hybrids had higher yields with 50 cm rows in both years.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The majority of hybrids reached higher yields in both years using the 50 cm row spacing.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainy September slowed maize ripening and water release in 2013.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rainy September slowed ripening and the water release of the hybrids in 2013”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainy September was associated with higher maize grain moisture at harvest.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rainy September slowed ripening and the water release of the hybrids in 2013, so the grain wet content at harvest showed higher values.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture content increased in some maize hybrids despite favorable water loss dynamics.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The moisture contents were increased for some hybrids, in spite of the positive and favorable dynamic of water loss.”
t0“maize”
The same questions in other papers
rainfall · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
654 papers more in this group
See all 658 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.