Paper · 2019 · Semina Ciências Agrárias

Growth, nutrient concentration, nutrient accumulation and visual symptoms of nutrient deficiencies in cherry tomato plants

Janini Tatiane Lima Souza Maia; Hermínia Emília Prieto Martinez; Junia Maria Clemente; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Tomato is one of the most popular vegetables, with high nutrient demand. The nutrient concentration can vary depending on the development phase, cultivation system, temperature, soil conditions, luminosity, relative humidity and management practices. The aim of this work was to characterize cherry tomato visual symptoms of deficiency, as well as the effect of nutritional restriction on the development and nutrient concentration of plants cultivated in nutrient solution. Plants of the cherry tomato, cultivar Sindy, were grown in green house. We have used eleven treatments, one control with complete nutrient solution and the other ten omitting respectively the nutrients nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, boron, copper, zinc and iron. The experiment was performed in randomized design with three repetitions. After 60 days, the plants were removed from the solutions and their main symptoms were photographed and described. The traits evaluated were: total dry matter yield, dry matter of leaves, dry matter of stems and dry matter of roots; number of leaves, number of inflorescences; number of fruits and root volume. The concentration and accumulation of nutrients: nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, boron, copper, zinc and iron in leaves, stems and roots were evaluated. Nutrient concentration and accumulation were influenced by the deficiencies imposed. The visual symptoms of deficiency that had appeared firstly were those of phosphorus, boron and iron, respectively. The omissions of the nutrients nitrogen, magnesium and boron were the ones that most compromised the dry matter production of the cherry tomato plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient deficiencies influenced concentration and accumulation in cherry tomato.

Treatment
deficiencies imposede0
Outcome
Nutrient concentration and accumulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient concentration and accumulation were influenced by the deficiencies imposed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus deficiency symptoms appeared first, followed by boron and iron.

Outcome
visual symptoms of deficiencye0
Qualifier
phosphorus, boron and irone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The visual symptoms of deficiency that had appeared firstly were those of phosphorus, boron and iron, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omission of nitrogen most compromised cherry tomato dry matter production.

Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
most compromisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The omissions of the nutrients nitrogen, magnesium and boron were the ones that most compromised the dry matter production of the cherry tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omission of magnesium most compromised cherry tomato dry matter production.

Treatment
magnesiume0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
most compromisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The omissions of the nutrients nitrogen, magnesium and boron were the ones that most compromised the dry matter production of the cherry tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omission of boron most compromised cherry tomato dry matter production.

Treatment
borone0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
most compromisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The omissions of the nutrients nitrogen, magnesium and boron were the ones that most compromised the dry matter production of the cherry tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1687 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

29 papers: 23 positive, 6 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

boron atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 172 positive, 38 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.