Paper · 2019 · Agronomy Journal

Improving Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain through Combined Foliar Applications of Zinc and Pesticides

Shaoxia Wang; Xiaoyuan Zhang; Ke Liu; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Foliar zinc (Zn) applied together with any pesticides caused similar increase in whole grain and grain milling fractions Zn concentrations as compared with foliar Zn application alone. Foliar Zn applied simultaneously with pesticides significantly increased estimated Zn bioavailability in whole grain and grain milling fractions; the increases were comparable to foliar Zn application alone. Higher Zn concentration and bioavailability in whole grain with Zn applied at milk stage with or without pesticides indicated efficient absorption of Zn by wheat plants compared with Zn applied at flowering stage. ABSTRACT Foliar ZnSO 4 application has been shown to be effective for increasing Zn concentration in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) grain but is time and energy consuming. For promoting adoption of this practice by growers, a field experiment was conducted in two seasons to evaluate the effects of foliar Zn combined with six commonly used pesticides (three insecticides and three fungicides) applied at flowering or milk stage on Zn concentration and bioavailability in wheat grain and its milling fractions. Grains were fractionated into flour and bran for analysis of Zn, phytic acid (PA), and other nutrients (protein, P, K, Fe, and Mn). The results showed that foliar application of Zn together with various pesticides, irrespective of pesticide type, was as effective as foliar Zn application alone in improving Zn concentrations in whole grain and in its milling fractions. Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticides did not increase PA concentration but significantly increased the estimated Zn bioavailability in flour by 79.2%, in bran by 95.4%, and in grain by 94.5%. Zinc foliar application (with or without pesticides) at milk stage resulted in a higher Zn concentration and bioavailability in whole grain than Zn applied at flowering stage. There were no adverse effects of combined foliar application of Zn and pesticides on grain yield and other nutrients. Therefore, foliar Zn application can be safely applied with commonly used fungicides or insecticides (particularly at milk stage) to enrich Zn of the whole grain and particularly the flour and represents a useful practice for overcoming human Zn deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc with pesticides improved whole grain and milling fraction zinc concentration as effectively as foliar zinc alone.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn together with various pesticidese0
Outcome
Zn concentrations in whole grain and in its milling fractionse0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
foliar Zn application alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Zn together with various pesticides, irrespective of pesticide type, was as effective as foliar Zn application alone in improving Zn concentrations in whole grain and in its milling fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar zinc and pesticides did not increase grain phytic acid concentration.

Treatment
Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticidese0
Outcome
PA concentratione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticides did not increase PA concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1582 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar zinc and pesticides raised estimated zinc bioavailability in flour by 79.2%.

Treatment
Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticidese0
Outcome
estimated Zn bioavailability in floure0
Direction
increasede0
Value
79.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticides did not increase PA concentration but significantly increased the estimated Zn bioavailability in flour by 79.2%, in bran by 95.4%, and in grain by 94.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar zinc and pesticides raised estimated zinc bioavailability in bran by 95.4%.

Organ / stage
brane0
Treatment
Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticidese0
Outcome
Zn bioavailability in floure0
Direction
increasede0
Value
95.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticides did not increase PA concentration but significantly increased the estimated Zn bioavailability in flour by 79.2%, in bran by 95.4%, and in grain by 94.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar zinc and pesticides raised estimated zinc bioavailability in grain by 94.5%.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticidese0
Outcome
Zn bioavailability in floure0
Direction
increasede0
Value
94.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined foliar application of Zn with pesticides did not increase PA concentration but significantly increased the estimated Zn bioavailability in flour by 79.2%, in bran by 95.4%, and in grain by 94.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc at milk stage produced higher whole grain zinc concentration and bioavailability than application at flowering.

Treatment
Zinc foliar application (with or without pesticides) at milk stagee0
Outcome
Zn concentration and bioavailability in whole graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Zn applied at flowering stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc foliar application (with or without pesticides) at milk stage resulted in a higher Zn concentration and bioavailability in whole grain than Zn applied at flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar zinc and pesticides had no adverse effect on grain yield or other nutrients.

Treatment
combined foliar application of Zn and pesticidese0
Outcome
grain yield and other nutrientse0
Direction
no adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no adverse effects of combined foliar application of Zn and pesticides on grain yield and other nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying foliar zinc with commonly used pesticides, especially at milk stage, to enrich grain and flour zinc.

Treatment
foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
enrich Zn of the whole grain and particularly the floure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar Zn application can be safely applied with commonly used fungicides or insecticides (particularly at milk stage) to enrich Zn of the whole grain and particularly the flour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2009–2186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 456 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

insecticide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

insecticide · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 97 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.