Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar zinc at milk stage produced higher whole grain zinc concentration and bioavailability than application at flowering.

A claim from Improving Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain through Combined Foliar Applications of Zinc and Pesticides · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc at milk stage produced higher whole grain zinc concentration and bioavailability than application at flowering.

Treatment
Zinc foliar application (with or without pesticides) at milk stagee0
Outcome
Zn concentration and bioavailability in whole graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Zn applied at flowering stagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc foliar application (with or without pesticides) at milk stage resulted in a higher Zn concentration and bioavailability in whole grain than Zn applied at flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1879
t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63

Title

Improving Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain through Combined Foliar Applications of Zinc and Pesticides

Shaoxia Wang; Xiaoyuan Zhang; Ke Liu; et al. Agronomy Journal 2019. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.09.0597

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1694de1a4f2545b92deccb777d43e7213923d6c79eb8f8fc9e907d5ab5f71c4e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

insecticide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.