Abstract
Little attention has been paid to the combined use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) and steel slag (SS) for ameliorating heavy metal polluted soils. A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted to study the effects of SS and AMF−Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), Glomus versiforme (Gv) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri) on plant growth and Cd, Pb uptake by maize grown in soils added with 5 mg Cd kg−1 and 300 mg Pb kg−1 soil. The combined usage of AMF and SS (AMF + SS) promoted maize growth, and Gv + SS had the most obvious effect. Meanwhile, single SS addition and AMF + SS decreased Cd, Pb concentrations in maize, and the greater reductions were found in combined utilization, and the lowest Cd, Pb concentrations of maize appeared in Gv + SS. Single SS amendment and AMF + SS enhanced soil pH and decreased soil diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable Cd, Pb concentrations. Furthermore, alone and combined usage of AMF and SS increased contents of soil total glomalin. Our research indicated a synergistic effect between AMF and SS on enhancing plant growth and reducing Cd, Pb accumulation in maize, and Gv + SS exerted the most pronounced effect. This work suggests that AMF inoculation in combination with SS addition may be a potential method for not only phytostabilization of Pb-Cd-contaminated soil but maize safety production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Combined mycorrhizal fungi and steel slag promoted maize growth, with Gv plus slag most effective.
- Treatment
- AMF + SSe0
- Outcome
- maize growthe0
- Direction
- promotede0
- Qualifier
- Gv + SS had the most obvious effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined usage of AMF and SS (AMF + SS) promoted maize growth, and Gv + SS had the most obvious effect.”
Claim · model-written summary
Slag alone and combined with fungi decreased maize Cd and Pb concentrations; combined treatment had greater reductions and Gv plus slag was lowest.
- Treatment
- single SS addition and AMF + SSe0
- Outcome
- Cd, Pb concentrations in maizee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- the lowest Cd, Pb concentrations of maize appeared in Gv + SSe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“single SS addition and AMF + SS decreased Cd, Pb concentrations in maize, and the greater reductions were found in combined utilization, and the lowest Cd, Pb concentrations of maize appeared in Gv + SS.”
Claim · model-written summary
Slag alone and with fungi increased soil pH and decreased extractable Cd and Pb.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Single SS amendment and AMF + SS enhanced soil pH and decreased soil diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable Cd, Pb concentrations.”
Claim · model-written summary
Alone and combined use of fungi and slag increased soil total glomalin.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“alone and combined usage of AMF and SS increased contents of soil total glomalin.”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
118 papers more in this group
See all 122 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
184 papers more in this group
See all 188 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.