Paper · 2019 · Journal of Applied Sciences

Biochemical Effects of Chitosan Coating and Hot Water Dipping on Green Bean Decay During Cold Storage

Abdelaleim Ismail ElS; Azza Hosni Moha; Dennis Calvin Ode; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background and Objective: Normally fresh green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) harvested seasonally and stored at room-temperature with short shelf-life (maximum 7 days). Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of chitosan coating (CC) and hot water dipping (HWD) on physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of the fresh-cut green bean and to determine extending storage periods and improve the quality. As well as to control color degradation and expand shelf-life of fresh-cut green bean. Materials and Methods: Fresh-cut green beans were treated with CC (at 0.5-1.5%) and HWD (at 45EC for 15 min or 55EC for 1 min). The treated samples were stored at 4EC in a refrigerator set at 85-90% relative humidity for 28 d. Physico-chemical properties (weight loss and decay, total soluble solids content, total acidity, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, reducing sugars, protein, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities, vitamin C and free phenolic compounds) and sensory properties were analyzed for all the treated samples at the storage points. Results: Fresh-cut green beans treated with CC at 1.5% exhibited the lowest decay (4.66%) while HWD treatments had the highest decay (25.5-48%) compared to 19.66% decay from the untreated control. Sensorial characteristics (color, skin loss, fibrousness, texture and flavor) were maintained and the quality of green bean pods improved under CC at 1.5%. Chitosan coating (1.5%) reduced weight loss, titratable acidity, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities under the storage condition compared to other treatments. The reduction in peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities enhanced active oxygen-scavenging systems in the fresh-cut green bean. The phenolics and total soluble solids content increased with CC at 1.5% in fresh-cut green bean at 28 days of storage period. Also, protein and reducing sugars content increased when fresh-cut green bean was subjected to CC at 1.5%. Conclusion: These results showed that the quality of fresh-cut green bean could be amended and the shelf life extended by treating pods post harvest with CC at 1.5%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating at 1.5% produced the lowest green bean decay, 4.66%, versus 19.66% in untreated controls.

Taxon
green beanse0
Treatment
CC at 1.5%e0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.66%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh-cut green beans treated with CC at 1.5% exhibited the lowest decay (4.66%) while HWD treatments had the highest decay (25.5-48%) compared to 19.66% decay from the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water dipping produced the highest green bean decay, 25.5–48%, versus 19.66% in untreated controls.

Taxon
green beanse0
Treatment
HWD treatmentse0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.5-48%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh-cut green beans treated with CC at 1.5% exhibited the lowest decay (4.66%) while HWD treatments had the highest decay (25.5-48%) compared to 19.66% decay from the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating at 1.5% maintained green bean sensory characteristics and improved pod quality.

Taxon
green beane0
Treatment
CC at 1.5%e0
Outcome
Sensorial characteristicse0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sensorial characteristics (color, skin loss, fibrousness, texture and flavor) were maintained and the quality of green bean pods improved under CC at 1.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating at 1.5% reduced green bean weight loss and titratable acidity versus other treatments.

Taxon
Green Beant0
Treatment
Chitosan coating (1.5%)e0
Outcome
weight loss, titratable aciditye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan coating (1.5%) reduced weight loss, titratable acidity, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities under the storage condition compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating at 1.5% reduced peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities versus other treatments.

Taxon
Green Beant0
Treatment
Chitosan coating (1.5%)e0
Outcome
peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activitiese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan coating (1.5%) reduced weight loss, titratable acidity, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities under the storage condition compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–75 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities enhanced active oxygen-scavenging systems in fresh-cut green bean.

Taxon
green beane0
Gene
peroxidase and polyphenol oxidasee0
Outcome
active oxygen-scavenging systemse0
Direction
enhancede0

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities enhanced active oxygen-scavenging systems in the fresh-cut green bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating at 1.5% increased phenolics and total soluble solids in fresh-cut green bean after 28 days.

Taxon
green beane0
Treatment
CC at 1.5%e0
Outcome
phenolics and total soluble solids contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
28 days of storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The phenolics and total soluble solids content increased with CC at 1.5% in fresh-cut green bean at 28 days of storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating at 1.5% increased protein and reducing sugars in fresh-cut green bean.

Taxon
green beane0
Treatment
CC at 1.5%e0
Outcome
protein and reducing sugars contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“protein and reducing sugars content increased when fresh-cut green bean was subjected to CC at 1.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–1960 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 1.5% chitosan coating improves fresh-cut green bean quality and extends shelf life.

Taxon
green beane0
Treatment
CC at 1.5%e0
Outcome
qualitye0

Verbatim

e0

“the quality of fresh-cut green bean could be amended and the shelf life extended by treating pods post harvest with CC at 1.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2126 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

heat · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

storage · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.