Paper · 2020 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

EFFECT OF SOME POSTHARVEST TREATMENTS ON QUALITY OF FRESH FULL AND CUT SNAP BEAN PODS DURING COLD STORAGE

Omaima Mohammed; Rabab Ahmed

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Great economic losses to harvested vegetable fruits are raised by postharvest chilling injury during transportation and storage, which can be safety controlled by some polysaccharide materials as chitosan.The effect of different dipping treatments viz; control (tap water for 5 min.) and chitosan at 0.5 and 1% for 5 min. as well as nano chitosan at 25 and 50 ppm for 5 min. on quality of full and cutting pods of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Paulista during cold storage.So, two experiments were conducted at Agric. Res. Farm, El-Kassasien Hort. Res. Station, Ismalia Governorate, and Handling Lab., Hort. Dept., Fac. Agric., Zagazig University, Egypt during the two autumn consecutive seasons of 2016/ 2017 and 2017/2018.Pods weight loss (%), general appearance score, total chlorophyll content (SPAD unit), firmness (g/cm2), total soluble solids (TSS as Brix°), crude fiber (%), total microbial count (log 10 CFU/g), polyphenol oxidase activity (unit/g as fresh weight), total phenol content (mg/g as fresh weight) and crude protein (%) of snap bean pods were evaluated at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 days of storage at 4°C and 90% relative humidity.The obtained results referred to that the dipping full pods in the solutions of chitosan at 1% or nano chitosan at 50 and/or 25 ppm presented more effective preservative effect on decreasing weight loss percentage, total soluble solids, crude fiber, total microbial count and polyphenol oxidase activity and maintained pod quality and gave pods with good appearance, total chlorophyll, firmness and total phenolic after 12 days of storage at 4ºC and 90% relative humidity than other treatments or control during different cold storage periods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective dips decreased pod weight loss, total soluble solids and crude fiber relative to other treatments or control.

Taxon
snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarise1
Organ / stage
full podse0
Treatment
chitosan at 1%e0
Outcome
weight loss percentage, total soluble solids, crude fibere0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storage at 4ºC and 90% relative humiditye0
Comparator
other treatments or controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dipping full pods in the solutions of chitosan at 1% or nano chitosan at 50 and/or 25 ppm presented more effective preservative effect on decreasing weight loss percentage, total soluble solids, crude fiber, total microbial count and polyphenol oxidase activity and maintained pod quality and gave pods with good appearance, total chlorophyll, firmness and total phenolic after 12 days of storage at 4ºC and 90% relative humidity than other treatments or control during different cold storage periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Paulista”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective dips decreased total microbial count and polyphenol oxidase activity relative to other treatments or control.

Taxon
snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarise1
Organ / stage
full podse0
Treatment
nano chitosan at 50 and/or 25 ppme0
Outcome
total microbial count and polyphenol oxidase activitye0
Direction
decreasinge0
Comparator
other treatments or controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dipping full pods in the solutions of chitosan at 1% or nano chitosan at 50 and/or 25 ppm presented more effective preservative effect on decreasing weight loss percentage, total soluble solids, crude fiber, total microbial count and polyphenol oxidase activity and maintained pod quality and gave pods with good appearance, total chlorophyll, firmness and total phenolic after 12 days of storage at 4ºC and 90% relative humidity than other treatments or control during different cold storage periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Paulista”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective dips maintained pod quality and good appearance, chlorophyll and firmness after 12 days of storage.

Taxon
snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
chitosan at 1%e0
Outcome
pod quality and gave pods with good appearance, total chlorophyll, firmnesse0
Direction
maintainede0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storage at 4ºC and 90% relative humiditye0
Comparator
other treatments or controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dipping full pods in the solutions of chitosan at 1% or nano chitosan at 50 and/or 25 ppm presented more effective preservative effect on decreasing weight loss percentage, total soluble solids, crude fiber, total microbial count and polyphenol oxidase activity and maintained pod quality and gave pods with good appearance, total chlorophyll, firmness and total phenolic after 12 days of storage at 4ºC and 90% relative humidity than other treatments or control during different cold storage periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Paulista”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective dips maintained total phenolic after 12 days of storage.

Taxon
snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
nano chitosan at 50 and/or 25 ppme0
Outcome
total phenolice0
Direction
maintainede0
Qualifier
after 12 days of storage at 4ºC and 90% relative humiditye0
Comparator
other treatments or controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dipping full pods in the solutions of chitosan at 1% or nano chitosan at 50 and/or 25 ppm presented more effective preservative effect on decreasing weight loss percentage, total soluble solids, crude fiber, total microbial count and polyphenol oxidase activity and maintained pod quality and gave pods with good appearance, total chlorophyll, firmness and total phenolic after 12 days of storage at 4ºC and 90% relative humidity than other treatments or control during different cold storage periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Paulista”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–460 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: biology · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.