Paper · 2019 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

Evaluation of pre- and post-emergence herbicides for weed control in maize (Zea mays L.)

Arben Mehmeti; Rozafa Fetahaj; Adem Demaj; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2014–2015 to investigate the efficacy of herbicides [Merlin flexx (isoxaflutole), pre- and post-emergence; Equip (foramsulfuron), post-emergence; and Maister (foramsulfuron + iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium), post-emergence] in maize (cv NSC 444) crops grown in the Prishtina region of Kosovo. The field experiment was set in a randomised block design with four replications and elementary plots of 10 m2. A total of 14 weed species were documented in the maize crop in 2014, which increased to 27 in 2015, with the dominant species being Amaranthus retroflexus (87.0 plants*m-2 in 2014 versus 43.3 plants*m-2 in 2015). The most efficient herbicides in both years were pre-emergence (98.1% vs 92.5%; 2014 vs 2015) and isoxaflutole post-emergence (98.8% vs 89.9%; 2014 vs 2015). All plots treated with herbicides significantly influenced the increase of maize yield in comparison with the control plots. In conclusion, the use of isoxaflutole either pre-emergence or post-emergence is recommended in the study region for successful weed control and high maize grain yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen weed species occurred in the 2014 maize crop.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
weed speciese0
Value
14 weed speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 14 weed species were documented in the maize crop in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-seven weed species occurred in the 2015 maize crop.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
weed speciese1
Direction
increasede0
Value
27e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which increased to 27 in 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed species were documented in the maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranthus retroflexus was the dominant weed, at 87.0 plants*m-2 in 2014.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Amaranthus retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0weed
Outcome
dominant speciese0
Value
87.0 plants*m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · InteractorLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dominant species being Amaranthus retroflexus (87.0 plants*m-2 in 2014 versus 43.3 plants*m-2 in 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranthus retroflexus density was 43.3 plants*m-2 in 2015.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Amaranthus retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0weed
Outcome
Amaranthus retroflexuse0
Value
43.3 plants*m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · InteractorLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amaranthus retroflexus (87.0 plants*m-2 in 2014 versus 43.3 plants*m-2 in 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence herbicide efficacy was 98.1% in 2014.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pre-emergencee0
Outcome
efficient herbicidese0
Direction
most efficiente0
Value
98.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most efficient herbicides in both years were pre-emergence (98.1% vs 92.5%; 2014 vs 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence herbicide efficacy was 92.5% in 2015.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pre-emergencee0
Outcome
efficient herbicidese0
Direction
most efficiente0
Value
92.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most efficient herbicides in both years were pre-emergence (98.1% vs 92.5%; 2014 vs 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence isoxaflutole efficacy was 98.8% in 2014.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
isoxaflutole post-emergencee0
Outcome
isoxaflutole post-emergencee0
Value
98.8%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoxaflutole post-emergence (98.8% vs 89.9%; 2014 vs 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence isoxaflutole efficacy was 89.9% in 2015.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
isoxaflutole post-emergencee0
Outcome
isoxaflutole post-emergencee0
Value
89.9%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isoxaflutole post-emergence (98.8% vs 89.9%; 2014 vs 2015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicide treated plots had significantly greater maize yield than controls.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treated with herbicidese0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plots treated with herbicides significantly influenced the increase of maize yield in comparison with the control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend pre-emergence or post-emergence isoxaflutole for weed control and maize grain yield in the study region.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
isoxaflutole either pre-emergence or post-emergencee0
Outcome
successful weed control and high maize grain yieldse0
Setting
study regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of isoxaflutole either pre-emergence or post-emergence is recommended in the study region for successful weed control and high maize grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 · show in text ↑

isoxaflutole · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.