Paper · 2017 · Weed Technology

Relative Safety of Preemergence Corn Herbicides Applied to Coarse-Textured Soil

Kurt M. Vollmer; Mark J. VanGessel; Quintin R. Johnson; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop safety is an important consideration in determining PRE herbicide application, especially when multiple herbicide sites-of-action are used. This research examined relative corn injury as the result of PRE applications containing ALS- and/or HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to a sandy loam soil. Herbicide premixes containing clopyralid, flumetsulam, isoxaflutole, mesotrione, rimsulfuron, tembotrione, thifensulfuron, and thiencarbazone were applied at twice the labeled rate. In general, isoxaflutole alone was the safest herbicide evaluated, while PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicides caused the most corn stunting, had a lower recovery rate, and lower yields. However, POST applications of mesotrione plus rimsulfuron stunted corn less than 2%. Although there was little correlation between corn injury and yield, growers should be aware of the other factors, such as soil texture and environment that may impact crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoxaflutole alone was the safest herbicide evaluated for corn

Treatment
isoxaflutole alonee1
Outcome
safest herbicidee1
Direction
safeste1
Comparator
herbicide evaluatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research examined relative corn injury as the result of PRE applications containing ALS- and/or HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to a sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“In general, isoxaflutole alone was the safest herbicide evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicides caused the most corn stunting

Treatment
PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicidese2
Outcome
corn stuntinge2
Direction
moste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research examined relative corn injury as the result of PRE applications containing ALS- and/or HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to a sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–293 · show in text ↑
e2

“PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicides caused the most corn stunting, had a lower recovery rate, and lower yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicides had a lower corn recovery rate

Treatment
PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicidese2
Outcome
recovery ratee2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research examined relative corn injury as the result of PRE applications containing ALS- and/or HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to a sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–293 · show in text ↑
e2

“PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicides caused the most corn stunting, had a lower recovery rate, and lower yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicides lowered corn yields

Treatment
PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicidese2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research examined relative corn injury as the result of PRE applications containing ALS- and/or HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to a sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–293 · show in text ↑
e2

“PRE applications of rimsulfuron-containing herbicides caused the most corn stunting, had a lower recovery rate, and lower yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST applications of mesotrione plus rimsulfuron stunted corn by less than 2%

Treatment
POST applications of mesotrione plus rimsulfurone3
Outcome
stunted corne3
Direction
stuntede3
Value
less than 2%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research examined relative corn injury as the result of PRE applications containing ALS- and/or HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to a sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, POST applications of mesotrione plus rimsulfuron stunted corn less than 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–763 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn injury and yield showed little correlation

Treatment
PRE applicationse0
Outcome
corn injury and yielde4
Direction
little correlatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This research examined relative corn injury as the result of PRE applications containing ALS- and/or HPPD-inhibiting herbicides to a sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–293 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although there was little correlation between corn injury and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–832 · show in text ↑

mesotrione · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

isoxaflutole · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rimsulfuron · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 26 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.