Paper · 2018 · Colloquium Agrariae

PRODUTIVIDADE, QUALIDADE FISIOLÓGICA E RESÍDUO EM SEMENTES DE TRIGO EM FUNÇÃO DA DESSECAÇÃO COM HERBICIDAS

Lizandro Ciciliano Tavares; Sandro de Oliveira; Bruno Moncks Silva; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In the wheat crop,pre-harvest desiccation with herbicides caninfluencethe productivity and physiological seed quality.The study aimed to quantify the yield, physiological seed quality,andresidue in wheat seeds.The experimental design was a randomized block designina 2x2x6 factorial, being thefactor A constituting of wheat cultivars (BRS 177 e BRS Umbu),the factor B application stages (before and after physiological maturation) and, factor C desiccation with different herbicides (2,4-D, paraquat, glyphosate, ammonium glufosinate, metsulfuron-methyl, and control) with four replications.The variables analyzed were thethousand seedsweight, hectoliter weight, number of antheciumper spike, seed yield, physiological seed quality by the vigortestsand standard germination, and residue in wheat seeds after the application of herbicides in pre-harvest.The desiccation in pre-harvest herbicide held at a later stage after physiological maturity, in general, does not affect the physiological quality and seed yield of BRS Umbu and BRS 177 cultivars. The application of methyl-metsulfuronand paraquat does not show residual effects on the seed independent of the application stage, while the application of ammonium glufosinate, glyphosate, and 2,4-D,when applied before the physiological maturity result residue levels in wheat seed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desiccation with herbicide applied at a later stage after physiological maturity does not affect the physiological quality or seed yield of BRS Umbu and BRS 177.

Material
BRS Umbu and BRS 177e1
Treatment
desiccation in pre-harvest herbicide held at a later stage after physiological maturitye1
Outcome
physiological quality and seed yielde1
Direction
does not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In the wheat crop,pre-harvest desiccation with herbicides canin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“The desiccation in pre-harvest herbicide held at a later stage after physiological maturity, in general, does not affect the physiological quality and seed yield of BRS Umbu and BRS 177 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1048 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat applied pre-harvest shows no residual effects on wheat seed, independent of application stage.

Treatment
methyl-metsulfuronand paraquate2
Outcome
residual effects on the seede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In the wheat crop,pre-harvest desiccation with herbicides canin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of methyl-metsulfuronand paraquat does not show residual effects on the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium glufosinate, glyphosate and 2,4-D applied before physiological maturity result in residue levels in wheat seed.

Treatment
ammonium glufosinate, glyphosate, and 2,4-De3
Outcome
residue levels in wheat seede3
Qualifier
when applied before the physiological maturitye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In the wheat crop,pre-harvest desiccation with herbicides canin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“the application of ammonium glufosinate, glyphosate, and 2,4-D,when applied before the physiological maturity result residue levels in wheat seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1332 · show in text ↑

herbicide · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

stage · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.