Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

The Combined Effect of Nitrogen Treatment and Weather Conditions on Wheat Protein-Starch Interaction and Dough Quality

Indrek Keres; Maarika Alaru; Reine Koppel; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this field crop study was to compare the effect of organic (cattle manure, off-season cover crop) and mineral N (NH4NO3; 0, 50, 100° 150 kg N ha−1) fertilizers on (i) gluten-starch interaction, and (ii) rheological properties of winter wheat dough. Data were collected from the long-term field experiment located in the Baltic Sea region (58°22′ N, 26°40′ E) in years 2013–2017. The amount of minuppueral N 150 kg ha−1 applied in two parts before flowering ensured higher gluten content (31 ± 3.3%) and dough quality (81 ± 7.4 mm) due to more positive interactions between gluten proteins and starch granules. The quality of dough was more variable in organic treatments (ranged up to 33%) because the availability of organic N was more variable and sensitivity to the weather conditions was higher. The mean variability of different dough properties over trial years under organic treatments was 1.4–2.0 times higher than in the treatment with 150 kg N ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral N at 150 kg ha-1 applied in two parts before flowering gave higher gluten content (31 ± 3.3%) in wheat.

Treatment
150 kg ha−1 applied in two parts before floweringe1
Outcome
gluten contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
31 ± 3.3%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“150 kg ha−1 applied in two parts before flowering ensured higher gluten content (31 ± 3.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral N at 150 kg ha-1 applied in two parts before flowering gave higher dough quality (81 ± 7.4 mm) in wheat.

Treatment
150 kg ha−1 applied in two parts before floweringe1
Outcome
dough qualitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
81 ± 7.4 mme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“150 kg ha−1 applied in two parts before flowering ensured higher gluten content (31 ± 3.3%) and dough quality (81 ± 7.4 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The higher gluten content and dough quality under 150 kg N ha-1 were attributed to more positive interactions between gluten proteins and starch granules.

Outcome
dough qualitye1
Qualifier
more positive interactions between gluten proteins and starch granulese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dough quality (81 ± 7.4 mm) due to more positive interactions between gluten proteins and starch granules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dough quality of wheat was more variable under organic treatments, ranging up to 33%.

Treatment
organic treatmentse1
Outcome
quality of doughe1
Direction
more variablee1
Value
up to 33%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The quality of dough was more variable in organic treatments (ranged up to 33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mean variability of different dough properties over trial years under organic treatments was 1.4-2.0 times higher than under 150 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
organic treatmentse1
Outcome
variability of different dough propertiese1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.4–2.0 timese1
Comparator
treatment with 150 kg N ha−1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The mean variability of different dough properties over trial years under organic treatments was 1.4–2.0 times higher than in the treatment with 150 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the greater variability of dough quality under organic treatments to more variable organic N availability and higher sensitivity to weather.

Treatment
organic treatmentse1
Outcome
quality of dough was more variablee1
Qualifier
availability of organic N was more variable and sensitivity to the weather conditions was highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The quality of dough was more variable in organic treatments (ranged up to 33%) because the availability of organic N was more variable and sensitivity to the weather conditions was higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

stage · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.