Paper · 2018 · Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies

Growth and Yield of Hybrid Corn under Different Fertilizer Applications

Agrotechnology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Raden R. R. Brotodjojo; Dyah Arbiwati

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Conventional agriculture is heavily depended on the use of inorganic fertilizer that provides sufficient macro nutrients, with some draw back on the environment. On the other hand, organic agriculture that only use organic fertilizers is considered environmentally friendly but sometimes could not provide adequate nutrients for plants. The aim of this research was study the growth and yield of hybrid corn treated with different dose of Granular Organic Fertilizer (GOF) in comparison to inorganic fertilizers. The corns were planted in polybags arranged in Randomized Completely Block Design with four treatments, i.e. 10 tons/ha GOF, 20 tons/ha GOF, 30 tons/ha GOF, inorganic fertilizers (630 kg/ha ZA, 350 kg/ha Urea, 100 kg/ha SP36, 380 kg/ha Phonska). Each treatment consisted of 20 plants with 6 replications. The results showed that the height of plants treated with 20 tons/ha GOF or 30 tons/ha GOF was not significantly different from plants treated with inorganic fertilizers, but was significantly higher than those treated with 10 tons/ha GOF. The number of leaves did not significantly affected by different fertilizers application. Furthermore, plants treated with inorganic fertilizers significantly had higher chlorophyll content and produced higher yield than those treated with GOF at various doses. This revealed that application of GOF on corn at dose of up to 30 tons/ha was not sufficient to produce high yield. To increased yield, higher dose of GOF is needed or it can be supplemented by application of inorganic fertilizers

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn height under 20 tons/ha organic fertilizer did not differ significantly from inorganic fertilizer.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
20 tons/ha GOFe0
Outcome
height of plantse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“height of plants treated with 20 tons/ha GOF or 30 tons/ha GOF was not significantly different from plants treated with inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn height under 30 tons/ha organic fertilizer did not differ significantly from inorganic fertilizer.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
30 tons/ha GOFe0
Outcome
height of plantse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“height of plants treated with 20 tons/ha GOF or 30 tons/ha GOF was not significantly different from plants treated with inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn under 20 tons/ha organic fertilizer was taller than under 10 tons/ha.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
20 tons/ha GOFe0
Outcome
height of plantse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
10 tons/ha GOFe0

Verbatim

e0

“height of plants treated with 20 tons/ha GOF or 30 tons/ha GOF was not significantly different from plants treated with inorganic fertilizers, but was significantly higher than those treated with 10 tons/ha GOF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn under 30 tons/ha organic fertilizer was taller than under 10 tons/ha.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
30 tons/ha GOFe0
Outcome
height of plantse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
10 tons/ha GOFe0

Verbatim

e0

“height of plants treated with 20 tons/ha GOF or 30 tons/ha GOF was not significantly different from plants treated with inorganic fertilizers, but was significantly higher than those treated with 10 tons/ha GOF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number did not differ significantly among fertilizers.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Treatment
different fertilizers applicatione0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
did not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The number of leaves did not significantly affected by different fertilizers application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants treated with inorganic fertilizers significantly had higher chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer produced higher chlorophyll than organic fertilizer.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
GOF at various dosese0

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with inorganic fertilizers significantly had higher chlorophyll content and produced higher yield than those treated with GOF at various doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer produced higher yield than organic fertilizer.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
GOF at various dosese0

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with inorganic fertilizers significantly had higher chlorophyll content and produced higher yield than those treated with GOF at various doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1318 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded organic fertilizer up to 30 tons/ha was insufficient for high corn yield.

Treatment
GOF on corn at dose of up to 30 tons/hae0
Outcome
high yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of GOF on corn at dose of up to 30 tons/ha was not sufficient to produce high yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1434 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend higher organic fertilizer doses or supplementing inorganic fertilizer.

Outcome
higher dose of GOF is needed or it can be supplemented by application of inorganic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To increased yield, higher dose of GOF is needed or it can be supplemented by application of inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.