Paper · 1989 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Plant growth responses to bacterization with selected Pseudomonas spp. strains and rhizosphere microbial development in hydroponic cultures

Ron van Peer; Bob Schippers

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
124
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increases in root and shoot fresh weight were observed when the nutrient solutions used for growth of tomato, cucumber, lettuce, and potato plants were bacterized with plant growth promoting Pseudomonas strains. It is hypothesized that plant growth promotion is due to the suppression of a deleterious rhizosphere microflora, especially deleterious endorhizosphere bacteria. The composition of the microbial community in artificial substrates, such as nutrient films and rockwool, is thought to be less complex than in soil. Therefore, development of a microflora deleterious for plant growth has to be anticipated. Microbial development in hydrocultures was simulated by preinoculating plant nutrient solutions with rhizosphere suspensions from plants that had been grown for different lengths of time in hydroponic cultures. After 16 days the plants in preinoculated nutrient solutions showed a growth reduction that correlated with the extent of root colonization by fluorescent pseudomonads in the endorhizosphere. Bacterization with plant growth promoting Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r counteracted this plant growth reduction. This increase in plant growth was accompanied by a dense colonization of the endorhizosphere by WCS417r and by a consequent displacement of indigenous endorhizosphere-inhabiting pseudomonads.Key words: Pseudomonas, endorhizosphere, hydroponics, plant growth, colonization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth promoting Pseudomonas increased root fresh weight of hydroponic crops.

Taxon
tomato, cucumber, lettuce, and potato plantsCucumis sativusSolanum lycopersicumSolanum tuberosumLactuca sativae0
Treatment
bacterized with plant growth promoting Pseudomonas strainse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas strainse0symbiont
Outcome
root and shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
Increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in root and shoot fresh weight were observed when the nutrient solutions used for growth of tomato, cucumber, lettuce, and potato plants were bacterized with plant growth promoting Pseudomonas strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preinoculated nutrient solutions reduced plant growth after 16 days.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
preinoculated nutrient solutionse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
16 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After 16 days the plants in preinoculated nutrient solutions showed a growth reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–913 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth reduction correlated with fluorescent pseudomonad colonization of the endorhizosphere.

Interactor
fluorescent pseudomonadsPseudomonas fluorescens groupe0e1other
Outcome
growth reductione0e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“growth reduction that correlated with the extent of root colonization by fluorescent pseudomonads in the endorhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 16 days the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WCS417r bacterization counteracted growth reduction.

Treatment
Bacterization with plant growth promoting Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417re0e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417rPseudomonas sp.e0e1symbiont
Outcome
plant growth reductione0e1
Direction
counteractede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterization with plant growth promoting Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r counteracted this plant growth reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1132 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 16 days the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–851 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth promotion coincided with dense WCS417r endorhizosphere colonization and displacement of indigenous pseudomonads.

Interactor
WCS417re0e1symbiont
Outcome
increase in plant growthe0e1
Direction
increasee0e1

Verbatim

e0

“This increase in plant growth was accompanied by a dense colonization of the endorhizosphere by WCS417r and by a consequent displacement of indigenous endorhizosphere-inhabiting pseudomonads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1324 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 16 days the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–851 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.