Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Assessment of Fruit Infestation of Abelmoschus esculentus by Shoot and Fruit Borer on Weight Basis

A.R. Lakhamapure; Sh.N.V. Lavhe; P.R. Panchabhai; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

To assess the shoot infestation and fruit damage of Abelmoschus esculentus on weight basis the experiment was undertaken during kharif season of 2016-17 in field of Insectory premises of Entomology Section, College of Agriculture, Nagpur. The trial incorporating nine treatments including control which were replicated thrice in Randomized Block Design. During this investigation, on the basis of above parameters revealed that, lowest infestation (shoot and fruit infestation) and highest yield over control was observed in treatment of Spinosad 45 SC 0.01% (T8; 6.52%) shoot infestation, 16.13% fruit damage with 86.79 q/ha yield followed by Emamectin benzoate 5 SG 0.02% (T7), Indoxacarb 15.5 EC 0.01% (T5), Acetamiprid 20 SP 0.2 g/lit (T6) Bacillus thuringensis 2ml/l (T4), Neem oil 2% (T1), NSE 5% (T3) and Karanj oil 2% (T2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad yielded the lowest shoot infestation at 6.52%.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
Spinosad 45 SC 0.01%e0
Interactor
Shoot and Fruit Borert1pest
Outcome
shoot infestatione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
6.52%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest infestation (shoot and fruit infestation) and highest yield over control was observed in treatment of Spinosad 45 SC 0.01% (T8; 6.52%) shoot infestation, 16.13% fruit damage with 86.79 q/ha yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Abelmoschus esculentus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruit Borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad yielded 16.13% fruit damage, the lowest infestation.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
Spinosad 45 SC 0.01%e0
Interactor
Shoot and Fruit Borert1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
16.13%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest infestation (shoot and fruit infestation) and highest yield over control was observed in treatment of Spinosad 45 SC 0.01% (T8; 6.52%) shoot infestation, 16.13% fruit damage with 86.79 q/ha yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Abelmoschus esculentus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruit Borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad produced the highest yield over control at 86.79 q/ha.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
Spinosad 45 SC 0.01%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
86.79 q/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest yield over control was observed in treatment of Spinosad 45 SC 0.01% (T8; 6.52%) shoot infestation, 16.13% fruit damage with 86.79 q/ha yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Abelmoschus esculentus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate ranked next after spinosad.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5 SG 0.02%e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
Spinosad 45 SC 0.01%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Emamectin benzoate 5 SG 0.02% (T7), Indoxacarb 15.5 EC 0.01% (T5), Acetamiprid 20 SP 0.2 g/lit (T6) Bacillus thuringensis 2ml/l (T4), Neem oil 2% (T1), NSE 5% (T3) and Karanj oil 2% (T2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowest infestation (shoot and fruit infestation) and highest yield over control was observed in treatment of Spinosad 45 SC 0.01%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Abelmoschus esculentus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–57 · show in text ↑

spinosad · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

spinosad · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.