Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Horticultural Science

Storability of some apricot varieties as affected by storage period

A. Ezzat; J. Nyéki; M. Soltész; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this study was the estimation of storability of 10 apricot varieties in regard to percentage fruit weight loss, firmness, acidity and T.S.S in fruit during storage periods from one week to 4 weeks. All the variety gave the same trend as all of them loss weight, firmness decreased, acidity and T.S.S decreased but the differences were not the same in all varieties. in case of some varieties the percentage of fruit weight loss reached to about 9 % after 28 days also the differences between varieties in two seasons refer that this character is determined by genetic factors beside effect of environmental and agriculture factors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight loss increased in all apricot varieties during storage periods of one to four weeks.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
storage periodse0
Outcome
fruit weight losse0
Direction
increaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storability of 10 apricot varieties in regard to percentage fruit weight loss, firmness, acidity and T.S.S in fruit during storage periods from one week to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the variety gave the same trend as all of them loss weight, firmness decreased, acidity and T.S.S decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness decreased during storage of the apricot varieties.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
storage periodse0
Outcome
firmnesse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storability of 10 apricot varieties in regard to percentage fruit weight loss, firmness, acidity and T.S.S in fruit during storage periods from one week to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the variety gave the same trend as all of them loss weight, firmness decreased, acidity and T.S.S decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidity decreased during storage of the apricot varieties.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
storage periodse0
Outcome
aciditye1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storability of 10 apricot varieties in regard to percentage fruit weight loss, firmness, acidity and T.S.S in fruit during storage periods from one week to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the variety gave the same trend as all of them loss weight, firmness decreased, acidity and T.S.S decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T.S.S decreased during storage of the apricot varieties.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
storage periodse0
Outcome
T.S.Se1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storability of 10 apricot varieties in regard to percentage fruit weight loss, firmness, acidity and T.S.S in fruit during storage periods from one week to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the variety gave the same trend as all of them loss weight, firmness decreased, acidity and T.S.S decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–320 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some apricot varieties, fruit weight loss reached about 9% after 28 days.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Material
some varietiese2
Outcome
percentage of fruit weight losse2
Value
about 9 %e2
Qualifier
after 28 dayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storability of 10 apricot varieties in regard to percentage fruit weight loss, firmness, acidity and T.S.S in fruit during storage periods from one week to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“in case of some varieties the percentage of fruit weight loss reached to about 9 % after 28 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–473 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret the storage trait as determined by genetic factors, besides environmental and agricultural factors.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Outcome
this charactere3
Qualifier
determined by genetic factorse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storability of 10 apricot varieties in regard to percentage fruit weight loss, firmness, acidity and T.S.S in fruit during storage periods from one week to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–207 · show in text ↑
e3

“the differences between varieties in two seasons refer that this character is determined by genetic factors beside effect of environmental and agriculture factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apricot varieties differed in storability in two seasons.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Outcome
differences between varietiese3
Qualifier
in two seasonse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storability of 10 apricot varieties in regard to percentage fruit weight loss, firmness, acidity and T.S.S in fruit during storage periods from one week to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–207 · show in text ↑
e3

“the differences between varieties in two seasons refer that this character is determined by genetic factors beside effect of environmental and agriculture factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–641 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: sugar starch · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.