Paper · 2018 · Agronomy

Maize Canopy Photosynthetic Efficiency, Plant Growth, and Yield Responses to Tillage Depth

Jiying Sun; Julin Gao; Zhigang Wang; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Subsoil tillage loosens compacted soil for better plant growth, but promotes water loss, which is a concern in areas that are commonly irrigated. Therefore, our objective was to determine the physiological responses of high yield spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China. Our experiment during 2014 and 2015 used Zhengdan958 (Hybrid of Zheng58 × Chang7-2, produced by Henan academy of agricultural sciences of China, with the characteristics of tight plant type and high yield) and Xianyu335 (Hybrid of PH6WC × PH4CV, produced by Pioneer Corp of USA, with the characteristic of high yield and suitable of machine-harvesting) with three differing subsoil tillage depths (30, 40, or 50 cm) as the trial factor and shallow rotary tillage as a control. The results indicated that subsoil tillage increased shoot dry matter accumulation, leading to a greater shoot/root ratio. Subsoil tillage helped retain a greater leaf area index in each growth stage, increased the leaf area duration, net assimilation rate, and relative growth rate, and effectively delayed the aging of the blade. On average, compared with shallow rotary, the grain yields and water use efficiency increased by 0.7–8.9% and 1.93–18.49% in subsoil tillage treatment, respectively, resulting in the net income being increased by 2.24% to 6.97%. Additionally, the grain yield, water use efficiency, and net income were the highest under the treatment of a subsoil tillage depth of 50 cm. The results provided a theoretical basis for determining the suitable chiseling depth for high-yielding spring corn in the Western irrigation plains of Inner Mongolia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil tillage increased shoot dry matter accumulation compared with shallow rotary tillage.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
subsoil tillagee2
Outcome
shoot dry matter accumulatione2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
shallow rotary tillagee1
Setting
Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsoil tillage depths (30, 40, or 50 cm) as the trial factor and shallow rotary tillage as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–831 · show in text ↑
e2

“subsoil tillage increased shoot dry matter accumulation, leading to a greater shoot/root ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil tillage gave a greater shoot/root ratio compared with shallow rotary tillage.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
subsoil tillagee2
Outcome
shoot/root ratioe2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
shallow rotary tillagee1
Setting
Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsoil tillage depths (30, 40, or 50 cm) as the trial factor and shallow rotary tillage as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–831 · show in text ↑
e2

“subsoil tillage increased shoot dry matter accumulation, leading to a greater shoot/root ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil tillage retained a greater leaf area index in each growth stage.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Organ / stage
each growth stagee3
Treatment
Subsoil tillagee3
Outcome
leaf area indexe3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
shallow rotary tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsoil tillage depths (30, 40, or 50 cm) as the trial factor and shallow rotary tillage as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–831 · show in text ↑
e3

“Subsoil tillage helped retain a greater leaf area index in each growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil tillage increased leaf area duration, net assimilation rate and relative growth rate compared with shallow rotary tillage.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
subsoil tillagee1
Outcome
leaf area duration, net assimilation rate, and relative growth ratee4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
shallow rotary tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsoil tillage depths (30, 40, or 50 cm) as the trial factor and shallow rotary tillage as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–831 · show in text ↑
e4

“increased the leaf area duration, net assimilation rate, and relative growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoil tillage delayed the aging of the blade compared with shallow rotary tillage.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
subsoil tillagee1
Outcome
aging of the bladee5
Direction
delayede5
Comparator
shallow rotary tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsoil tillage depths (30, 40, or 50 cm) as the trial factor and shallow rotary tillage as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–831 · show in text ↑
e5

“effectively delayed the aging of the blade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased by 0.7–8.9% in subsoil tillage compared with shallow rotary tillage.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
subsoil tillage treatmente6
Outcome
grain yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
0.7–8.9%e6
Comparator
shallow rotarye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e6

“compared with shallow rotary, the grain yields and water use efficiency increased by 0.7–8.9% and 1.93–18.49% in subsoil tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency increased by 1.93–18.49% in subsoil tillage compared with shallow rotary tillage.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
subsoil tillage treatmente6
Outcome
water use efficiencye6
Direction
increasede6
Value
1.93–18.49%e6
Comparator
shallow rotarye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e6

“compared with shallow rotary, the grain yields and water use efficiency increased by 0.7–8.9% and 1.93–18.49% in subsoil tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net income increased by 2.24% to 6.97% in subsoil tillage compared with shallow rotary tillage.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
subsoil tillage treatmente6
Outcome
net incomee7
Direction
increasede7
Value
2.24% to 6.97%e7
Comparator
shallow rotarye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e6

“compared with shallow rotary, the grain yields and water use efficiency increased by 0.7–8.9% and 1.93–18.49% in subsoil tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1315 · show in text ↑
e7

“resulting in the net income being increased by 2.24% to 6.97%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, water use efficiency and net income were highest under a subsoil tillage depth of 50 cm.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
a subsoil tillage depth of 50 cme7
Outcome
grain yield, water use efficiency, and net incomee7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) to subsoil tillage depth when grown in the Western plain irrigation area of Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–354 · show in text ↑
e7

“the grain yield, water use efficiency, and net income were the highest under the treatment of a subsoil tillage depth of 50 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1534 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 75 positive, 8 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.