Paper · 2018 · Agriculture (Pol nohospodárstvo)

Vermicompost and Eisenia Foetida as Factors Influencing the Formation of Radish Phytomass

Peter Kováčik; Peter Šalamún; Jadwiga Wierzbowska

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Many of the world’s findings indicate the positive effect of earthworms on soil parameters, and consequently, on the formation of phytomass of cultivated plants. In our experiment we studied: A) the influence of soil itself, soil mixed with vermicompost in a ratio of 9:1; B) the influence of earthworms number (genus Eisenia foetida, 10 and 20 individuals per pot) supplied to soil mixed with vermicompost in the ratio of 9:1 on the dynamics of changes in the weight of radish roots, the total chlorophyll content in leaves and the selected qualitative parameters of the roots. The results obtained showed that one tenth proportion of vermicompost from the total weight of soil substrate caused the statistically significant increase in the total chlorophyll content in leaves, the increase in yield of radish roots, the reduction of the vitamin C content and the increase of nitrate content in the roots. The impact of earthworms on the chlorophyll content in leaves and on the root weight was negative. The addition of 10 individuals of earthworms into 20 kg of substrate (soil + vermicompost) resulted in the increased content of vitamin C and the decreased content of nitrates in the radish roots. Twenty earthworms added to vermicompost, compared to vermicompost alone, did not affect the vitamin C content and reduced the nitrate content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost significantly increased leaf chlorophyll.

Treatment
one tenth proportion of vermicomposte0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content in leavese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
soil substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one tenth proportion of vermicompost from the total weight of soil substrate caused the statistically significant increase in the total chlorophyll content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish Phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased radish root yield.

Treatment
one tenth proportion of vermicomposte0
Outcome
yield of radish rootse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
soil substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one tenth proportion of vermicompost from the total weight of soil substrate caused the statistically significant increase in the total chlorophyll content in leaves, the increase in yield of radish roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost reduced root vitamin C content.

Treatment
one tenth proportion of vermicomposte0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
soil substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one tenth proportion of vermicompost from the total weight of soil substrate caused the statistically significant increase in the total chlorophyll content in leaves, the increase in yield of radish roots, the reduction of the vitamin C content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish Phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased root nitrate content.

Treatment
one tenth proportion of vermicomposte0
Outcome
nitrate content in the rootse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
soil substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one tenth proportion of vermicompost from the total weight of soil substrate caused the statistically significant increase in the total chlorophyll content in leaves, the increase in yield of radish roots, the reduction of the vitamin C content and the increase of nitrate content in the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworms negatively affected leaf chlorophyll.

Treatment
earthwormse0
Interactor
earthwormsCrassiclitellatae0other
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leavese0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The impact of earthworms on the chlorophyll content in leaves and on the root weight was negative.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish Phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworms negatively affected root weight.

Treatment
earthwormse0
Interactor
earthwormsCrassiclitellatae0other
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The impact of earthworms on the chlorophyll content in leaves and on the root weight was negative.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish Phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten earthworms increased root vitamin C.

Treatment
10 individuals of earthworms into 20 kg of substrate (soil + vermicompost)e0
Interactor
earthwormsCrassiclitellatae0other
Outcome
content of vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 10 individuals of earthworms into 20 kg of substrate (soil + vermicompost) resulted in the increased content of vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish Phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten earthworms decreased root nitrates.

Treatment
10 individuals of earthworms into 20 kg of substrate (soil + vermicompost)e0
Interactor
earthwormsCrassiclitellatae0other
Outcome
content of nitrates in the radish rootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 10 individuals of earthworms into 20 kg of substrate (soil + vermicompost) resulted in the increased content of vitamin C and the decreased content of nitrates in the radish roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty earthworms did not affect vitamin C relative to vermicompost alone.

Treatment
Twenty earthworms added to vermicomposte0
Interactor
earthwormsCrassiclitellatae0other
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
vermicompost alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty earthworms added to vermicompost, compared to vermicompost alone, did not affect the vitamin C content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish Phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty earthworms reduced nitrate content relative to vermicompost alone.

Treatment
Twenty earthworms added to vermicomposte0
Interactor
earthwormsCrassiclitellatae0other
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
vermicompost alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty earthworms added to vermicompost, compared to vermicompost alone, did not affect the vitamin C content and reduced the nitrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish Phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ

112 papers: 107 positive, 5 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.