Paper · 2018 · Water Science & Technology Water Supply

Impacts of graywater irrigation and soil conditioning with mulch on cotton growth and soil properties

Z. Sheng; S. Abudu; G. Ganjegunte

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the impacts of graywater irrigation with and without soil conditioning with mulching on cotton growth and soil properties in El Paso, Texas, USA. Treatments included in the study were: freshwater irrigation without soil conditioning (control, treatment T0), freshwater irrigation with soil conditioning (treatment T1), graywater irrigation without soil conditioning (treatment T2) and with soil conditioning (treatment T3) with four replications. The pH, sodium absorption ratio (SAR) and electrical conductivity (EC) values of the graywater used in the study were 8.19, 16.0 and 1.54 dS/cm respectively. Results showed that graywater irrigation did not have significant impacts on cotton growth and lint yield. Soil conditioning with mulch increased cotton yield significantly (p < 0.05) compared with non-mulching regardless of water types. Graywater irrigation increased soil pH values significantly in the surface depth (0–15 cm), however, it did not have significant effects at greater depths (>15 cm). Significantly higher salinity and sodicity were observed in the upper 30 cm depths in the graywater irrigated mulched soils, while no changes were detected at greater depths (30–45 and 45–60 cm).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graywater irrigation had no significant impact on cotton growth and lint yield.

Treatment
graywater irrigatione0
Outcome
cotton growth and lint yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“graywater irrigation did not have significant impacts on cotton growth and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching significantly increased cotton yield regardless of water type.

Treatment
Soil conditioning with mulche0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
regardless of water typese0
Comparator
non-mulchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil conditioning with mulch increased cotton yield significantly (p < 0.05) compared with non-mulching regardless of water types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graywater irrigation significantly increased soil pH at 0–15 cm.

Treatment
Graywater irrigatione0
Outcome
soil pH valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
surface depth (0–15 cm)e0

Not reportedOrgan / stageComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Graywater irrigation increased soil pH values significantly in the surface depth (0–15 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graywater irrigation had no significant effect on soil pH below 15 cm.

Treatment
Graywater irrigatione1
Outcome
soil pH valuese1
Qualifier
greater depths (>15 cm)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it did not have significant effects at greater depths (>15 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“Graywater irrigation increased soil pH values significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graywater irrigated mulched soil had higher salinity and sodicity in the upper 30 cm.

Treatment
graywater irrigated mulched soilse0
Outcome
salinity and sodicitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
upper 30 cm depthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher salinity and sodicity were observed in the upper 30 cm depths in the graywater irrigated mulched soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No soil salinity or sodicity changes were detected at 30–60 cm.

Outcome
salinity and sodicitye1
Direction
no changese0
Qualifier
greater depths (30–45 and 45–60 cm)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while no changes were detected at greater depths (30–45 and 45–60 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“salinity and sodicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.