Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Efficacy of Organic Manures and Bio-fertilizers on Yield Attributes and Yield of Okra var. Chameli

Rukshana Bano; A.K. Soni; S.P. Singh; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the ‘Efficacy of organic manures and bio-fertilizers on yield attributes and yield of okra var. Chameli’ during rainy season 2016-17 at Horticulture Farm, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner (Jaipur) with consisted of 16 treatments combinations viz., organic manures (Control, FYM, Poultry Manure and Vermicompost) and bio-fertilizers (Control, PSB, VAM and Azotobacter) tested in randomized block design with three replications. results shows that the application of vermicompost @ 8 t ha-1 and Azotobacter alone significantly increased the number of fruit plant-1, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm) fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q) as compared to control, FYM and poultry manure. The combined application of vermicompost @ 8 t ha-1 + Azotobacter as seed inoculation proved to be most superior treatment combination in terms of fruit weight (g), fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 8 t ha-1 significantly increased fruit number, fruit weight and fruit length relative to control, FYM and poultry manure.

Material
Chamelit0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 8 t ha-1e0
Outcome
number of fruit plant-1, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control, FYM and poultry manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra var. Chameli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of vermicompost @ 8 t ha-1 and Azotobacter alone significantly increased the number of fruit plant-1, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm) fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q) as compared to control, FYM and poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 8 t ha-1 significantly increased fruit yields per plant, plot and hectare relative to control, FYM and poultry manure.

Material
Chamelit0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 8 t ha-1e0
Outcome
fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control, FYM and poultry manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra var. Chameli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of vermicompost @ 8 t ha-1 and Azotobacter alone significantly increased the number of fruit plant-1, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm) fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q) as compared to control, FYM and poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter alone significantly increased fruit number, weight and length relative to control, FYM and poultry manure.

Treatment
Azotobacter alonee0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
number of fruit plant-1, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control, FYM and poultry manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra var. Chameli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azotobacter alone significantly increased the number of fruit plant-1, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm) fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q) as compared to control, FYM and poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter alone significantly increased fruit yields per plant, plot and hectare.

Treatment
Azotobacter alonee0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control, FYM and poultry manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra var. Chameli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azotobacter alone significantly increased the number of fruit plant-1, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm) fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q) as compared to control, FYM and poultry manure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined vermicompost and Azotobacter seed inoculation was the most superior treatment for fruit weight and yields.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 8 t ha-1 + Azotobacter as seed inoculatione0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
fruit weight (g), fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q)e0
Direction
most superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra var. Chameli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“combined application of vermicompost @ 8 t ha-1 + Azotobacter as seed inoculation proved to be most superior treatment combination in terms of fruit weight (g), fruit yield plant-1 (g), fruit yield plot-1 (kg) and fruit yield hectare-1 (q)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–1017 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 48 positive, 4 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.