Paper · 2009 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Response of integrated nutrient management on yield, quality and physico-chemical characteristics of okra cv. Arka Anamika.

H. L. Bairwa; Anita Shukla; L. N. Mahawer; et al.

15
claims
26
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Okra produced highest number of fruits (18.36), fruit yield (182.50 g plant−1 and 135.18 q ha−1), fruit weight (17.65 g), length of fruits (12.26 cm) and thickness of fruits (1.898 cm) with the application of neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizers. The fruit yield was increased 29.30 per cent over control along with highest benefit cost ratio (3.19) in this treatment. Similarly, total chlorophyll content of leaves at 30 and 60 DAS (0.311 and 0.390 mg g−1 fresh weight) respectively, nitrogen (2.275%), phosphorus (1.060%) and potassium contents of leaves (1.443%) and protein content of fruit (1.86 g 100 g−1) were also highest with the same integrated nutrient management treatment. Integrated nutrient management emerged as the best over the nutrient management through both sole inorganic and organic sources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

number of fruits was highest with integrated nutrient management.

Treatment
neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.36e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra produced highest number of fruits (18.36), fruit yield (182.50 g plant−1 and 135.18 q ha−1), fruit weight (17.65 g), length of fruits (12.26 cm) and thickness of fruits (1.898 cm) with the application of neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fruit yield was highest with integrated nutrient management.

Treatment
neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
182.50 g plant−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra produced highest number of fruits (18.36), fruit yield (182.50 g plant−1 and 135.18 q ha−1), fruit weight (17.65 g), length of fruits (12.26 cm) and thickness of fruits (1.898 cm) with the application of neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fruit yield was highest with integrated nutrient management.

Treatment
neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
135.18 q ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra produced highest number of fruits (18.36), fruit yield (182.50 g plant−1 and 135.18 q ha−1), fruit weight (17.65 g), length of fruits (12.26 cm) and thickness of fruits (1.898 cm) with the application of neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fruit weight was highest with integrated nutrient management.

Treatment
neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.65 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra produced highest number of fruits (18.36), fruit yield (182.50 g plant−1 and 135.18 q ha−1), fruit weight (17.65 g), length of fruits (12.26 cm) and thickness of fruits (1.898 cm) with the application of neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

length of fruits was highest with integrated nutrient management.

Treatment
neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
length of fruitse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.26 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra produced highest number of fruits (18.36), fruit yield (182.50 g plant−1 and 135.18 q ha−1), fruit weight (17.65 g), length of fruits (12.26 cm) and thickness of fruits (1.898 cm) with the application of neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

thickness of fruits was highest with integrated nutrient management.

Treatment
neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
thickness of fruitse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.898 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra produced highest number of fruits (18.36), fruit yield (182.50 g plant−1 and 135.18 q ha−1), fruit weight (17.65 g), length of fruits (12.26 cm) and thickness of fruits (1.898 cm) with the application of neem cake 6 q ha−1 + vermicompost 10 q ha−1 + Azotobacter + PSB + 60% recommended dose of NPK through inorganic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield increased 29.30 per cent over control.

Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.30 per cente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit yield was increased 29.30 per cent over control along with highest benefit cost ratio (3.19) in this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment had the highest benefit cost ratio of 3.19.

Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.19e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest benefit cost ratio (3.19) in this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content was highest at 30 DAS, at 0.311 mg g−1 fresh weight.

Organ / stage
leaves at 30 and 60 DASe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.311e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content of leaves at 30 and 60 DAS (0.311 and 0.390 mg g−1 fresh weight) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“were also highest with the same integrated nutrient management treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content was highest at 60 DAS, at 0.390 mg g−1 fresh weight.

Organ / stage
leaves at 30 and 60 DASe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.390 mg g−1 fresh weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content of leaves at 30 and 60 DAS (0.311 and 0.390 mg g−1 fresh weight) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“were also highest with the same integrated nutrient management treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen content was highest at 2.275%.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.275%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen (2.275%), phosphorus (1.060%) and potassium contents of leaves (1.443%) and protein content of fruit (1.86 g 100 g−1) were also highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phosphorus content was highest at 1.060%.

Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.060%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus (1.060%) and potassium contents of leaves (1.443%) and protein content of fruit (1.86 g 100 g−1) were also highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf potassium content was highest at 1.443%.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
potassium contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.443%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium contents of leaves (1.443%) and protein content of fruit (1.86 g 100 g−1) were also highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit protein content was highest at 1.86 g 100 g−1.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.86 g 100 g−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content of fruit (1.86 g 100 g−1) were also highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged integrated nutrient management best among the tested nutrient sources.

Outcome
Integrated nutrient managemente0
Comparator
both sole inorganic and organic sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated nutrient management emerged as the best over the nutrient management through both sole inorganic and organic sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

botanical · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

78 papers: 69 positive, 9 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.