Paper · 2010 · Vegetable Science

Effect of vermicompost on yield and quality of kharif season Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]

Tamnna Sharma; Ashutosh Pandey; S D Updhyaya; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Vegetable Research Farm, JN KVV, Jabalpur during Kharif season of 2005 and 2006 to assess the effects of vermicompost on the performance under different fertility levels on okra. Trial consisted of sixteen treatments combinations of four does of vermicompost (V01: without vermicompost, V1:3, V2:4 and V3: 5 t ha-1) and four levels of fertility (F0: without fertilizer, F1: 40:30:30, F2: 60:45:45 and F3: 80:60:60 kg NPK ha-1). It may be published after incorporating corrections. Study revealed the highest plant height (97.7cm), nodes per plant(14), fruit diameter(5.7cm) and fruit yield (73.8qfha) as well as the protein content (18.5%) was recorded with fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ ha. This treatment also fetched net return of Rs. 46152 ha’ and gave benefit cost ration of 2.68 incorporation of vermicompost 5 t ha-1 also recorded significantly higher values of yield attributes, fruit yield (69.2/ha) and protein content(1 8.0%) as well as B:C ratio (2.11)with net return of Rs. 35614 ha-1. Application of vermicompost 5 t ha-1 proved equally good to recommended dose of fertilizes i.e. 80:60:60 kg NPK ha-1

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 5 t ha-1 performed equally well as the recommended NPK dose for okra.

Treatment
vermicompost 5 t ha-1e7
Outcome
proved equally goode7
Direction
proved equally goode7
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of vermicompost 5 t ha-1 proved equally good to recommended dose of fertilizes i.e. 80:60:60 kg NPK ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ha gave the highest plant height of okra.

Treatment
fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ hae1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
97.7cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Study revealed the highest plant height (97.7cm), nodes per plant(14), fruit diameter(5.7cm) and fruit yield (73.8qfha) as well as the protein content (18.5%) was recorded with fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ha gave the highest number of nodes per okra plant.

Treatment
fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ hae1
Outcome
nodes per plante1
Direction
higheste1
Value
14e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Study revealed the highest plant height (97.7cm), nodes per plant(14), fruit diameter(5.7cm) and fruit yield (73.8qfha) as well as the protein content (18.5%) was recorded with fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ha gave the highest fruit diameter of okra.

Treatment
fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ hae1
Outcome
fruit diametere1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.7cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Study revealed the highest plant height (97.7cm), nodes per plant(14), fruit diameter(5.7cm) and fruit yield (73.8qfha) as well as the protein content (18.5%) was recorded with fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ha gave the highest fruit yield of okra.

Treatment
fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ hae1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
73.8qfhae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Study revealed the highest plant height (97.7cm), nodes per plant(14), fruit diameter(5.7cm) and fruit yield (73.8qfha) as well as the protein content (18.5%) was recorded with fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ha gave the highest protein content of okra.

Treatment
fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ hae1
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
higheste1
Value
18.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Study revealed the highest plant height (97.7cm), nodes per plant(14), fruit diameter(5.7cm) and fruit yield (73.8qfha) as well as the protein content (18.5%) was recorded with fertility level of 80:60:60 kg NPK/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–732 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80:60:60 kg NPK/ha fertility treatment gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.68 for okra.

Outcome
benefit cost ratione2
Value
2.68e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment also fetched net return of Rs. 46152 ha’ and gave benefit cost ration of 2.68”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–826 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80:60:60 kg NPK/ha fertility treatment gave a net return of Rs. 46152 per hectare for okra.

Outcome
net returne2
Value
Rs. 46152 ha’e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment also fetched net return of Rs. 46152 ha’ and gave benefit cost ration of 2.68”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 5 t ha-1 significantly increased okra fruit yield.

Treatment
vermicompost 5 t ha-1e3
Outcome
fruit yielde3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
69.2/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“incorporation of vermicompost 5 t ha-1 also recorded significantly higher values of yield attributes, fruit yield (69.2/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 5 t ha-1 gave okra protein content of 18.0%.

Treatment
vermicompost 5 t ha-1e3
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
1 8.0%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“incorporation of vermicompost 5 t ha-1 also recorded significantly higher values of yield attributes, fruit yield (69.2/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–950 · show in text ↑
e4

“and protein content(1 8.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–978 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 5 t ha-1 gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.11 for okra.

Outcome
B:C ratioe5
Value
2.11e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“as well as B:C ratio (2.11)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at 5 t ha-1 gave a net return of Rs. 35614 per hectare for okra.

Outcome
net returne6
Value
Rs. 35614 ha-1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“with net return of Rs. 35614 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1039 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 190 positive, 17 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.