Paper · 2018 · Protected horticulture and Plant Factory

Changes of Plant Growth, Leaf Morphology and Cell Elongation of Spinacia oleracea Grown under Different Light-Emitting Diodes

Myungok Lee; Sangmin Park; Eunkyung Cho; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study aimed to determine effects of light-emitting diodes on plant growth, leaf morphology and cell elongation of two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea. Plants were grown in a NFT system for 25 days after transplanting (DAT) under the LEDs [White (W), Red and Blue (RB, ratio 2:1), Blue (B), Red (R) LED] under the same light intensity and photoperiod (130 molm -2 s -1 , 12 hours). The 'World-star' variety was significantly higher in shoot fresh and dry weights, leaf number, and leaf area than the 'Sushiro' variety. For the 'Worldstar' variety, the two treatments of mixed light (RB) and red light (R) showed a 35% higher shoot dry weight than that of blue light (B) and white light (W) at 25 DAT. In the 'Sushiro' variety, mixed light (RB) treatment, which had the highest shoot fresh and dry weights, showed 40% higher than the white light (W) treatment, which had the lowest shoot fresh and dry weights. Both varieties showed leaf epinasty symptom at 21 DAT only in both mixed light (RB) and red light (R), and red light (R) treatment showed significantly higher symptom than mixed light (RB), indicating the leaf epinasty is associated with red light. Microscopic observations of the cell size in the leaf center and edge parts showed that the cell density of leaf edge under the red light (R) was lower than that in leaf center, supporting previous reports that suggest an association of the cell size difference between the leaf center and edge with the leaf epinasty occurrence. Since the blue light (B) plays a role in alleviating the epinasty symptom caused by the red light (R), it seems necessary to identify the appropriate mixing ratio of the two light sources. In addition, the Worldstar variety seems to be more suitable for the cultivation of plant factory using LED light sources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 'World-star' variety, shoot fresh and dry weights were significantly higher than in 'Sushiro'.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Material
World-stare0
Outcome
shoot fresh and dry weightse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Sushiroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 'World-star' variety was significantly higher in shoot fresh and dry weights, leaf number, and leaf area than the 'Sushiro' variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–549 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 'World-star' variety, leaf number and leaf area were significantly higher than in 'Sushiro'.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Material
World-stare0
Outcome
leaf number, and leaf areae1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Sushiroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 'World-star' variety was significantly higher in shoot fresh and dry weights, leaf number, and leaf area than the 'Sushiro' variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under mixed light (RB) and red light (R), the 'Worldstar' variety had 35% higher shoot dry weight than under blue (B) and white (W) light at 25 DAT.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Material
Worldstare2
Treatment
mixed light (RB) and red light (R)e2
Outcome
shoot dry weighte2
Direction
highere2
Value
35%e2
Qualifier
at 25 DATe2
Comparator
blue light (B) and white light (W)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e2

“For the 'Worldstar' variety, the two treatments of mixed light (RB) and red light (R) showed a 35% higher shoot dry weight than that of blue light (B) and white light (W) at 25 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 'Sushiro' variety, mixed light (RB), which gave the highest shoot fresh and dry weights, gave 40% higher shoot fresh and dry weights than white light (W).

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Material
Sushiroe3
Treatment
mixed light (RB)e3
Outcome
shoot fresh and dry weightse3
Direction
highere3
Value
40%e3
Comparator
white light (W)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the 'Sushiro' variety, mixed light (RB) treatment, which had the highest shoot fresh and dry weights, showed 40% higher than the white light (W) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–890 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivars showed leaf epinasty at 21 DAT only under mixed light (RB) and red light (R).

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
mixed light (RB) and red light (R)e4
Outcome
leaf epinasty symptome4
Qualifier
at 21 DATe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both varieties showed leaf epinasty symptom at 21 DAT only in both mixed light (RB) and red light (R)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light (R) caused significantly more epinasty symptom than mixed light (RB).

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
red light (R)e5
Outcome
symptome5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
mixed light (RB)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e5

“red light (R) treatment showed significantly higher symptom than mixed light (RB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1130 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret leaf epinasty as associated with red light.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
red lighte6
Outcome
leaf epinastye6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e6

“indicating the leaf epinasty is associated with red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under red light (R), cell density at the leaf edge was lower than at the leaf center.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Organ / stage
leaf edgee7
Treatment
red light (R)e7
Outcome
cell densitye7
Direction
lowere7
Comparator
leaf centere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e7

“Microscopic observations of the cell size in the leaf center and edge parts showed that the cell density of leaf edge under the red light (R) was lower than that in leaf center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1367 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret blue light (B) as alleviating the epinasty symptom caused by red light (R).

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
blue light (B)e1
Outcome
epinasty symptome1
Direction
alleviatinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“Since the blue light (B) plays a role in alleviating the epinasty symptom caused by the red light (R)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1622 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend identifying the appropriate mixing ratio of the two light sources.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Outcome
appropriate mixing ratio of the two light sourcese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“it seems necessary to identify the appropriate mixing ratio of the two light sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1708 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the 'Worldstar' variety is more suitable for plant factory cultivation under LED light.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae0
Material
Worldstare1
Outcome
more suitable for the cultivatione1
Setting
plant factorye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars ('World-star' and 'Sushiro') of Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Worldstar variety seems to be more suitable for the cultivation of plant factory using LED light sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1831 · show in text ↑

light · disease · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

light · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 23 positive, 11 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.