Paper · 2017 · Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development

Effect of planting technique and weed management practices on Ridge-Furrow planting of pigeonpea rice intercropping

Kiran Rana; J.P. Singh; S.P. Singh

18
claims
58
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRP-Dryland Agriculture), Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi for three consecutive years from 2014–15, 2015 16 to 2016–17 to find out the impact of planting method and weed management practices on ridge-furrow planted Pigeonpea + Rice intercropping. Among the different planting methods tested, planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon resulted in maximum yield of both pigeonpea (1839.64 kg/ha), rice (644.84 kg/ha), PEY (2044.48 kg/ha), LER (1.42) and MAI (13309.37). It also performed better in terms of net returns (67158.68/ha), B: C ratio (3.01) and RWUE both in terms of yield (2.25 kg/ha mm) and economic returns (73.72/ha-mm). Out of the various weed management practices, 100% population of both crops + hand weeding resulted in higher yield of pigeonpea (1463.33 kg/ha) with PEY (1656.43 kg/ha), RWUE (1.87 kg/ha-mm and 54.35/ha-mm). However, maximum value of rice yield (613.30 kg/ha), LER (1.11) and MAI (7685.07) were reported in treatment involving 150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and no weeding while 150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and hand weeding resulted in highest net returns of 49389.77/ha and B: C ratio of 2.31.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting gave the maximum pigeonpea yield, 1839.64 kg/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
1839.64 kg/hae1
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon resulted in maximum yield of both pigeonpea (1839.64 kg/ha), rice (644.84 kg/ha), PEY (2044.48 kg/ha), LER (1.42) and MAI (13309.37)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting gave the maximum rice yield, 644.84 kg/ha.

Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
644.84 kg/hae1
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon resulted in maximum yield of both pigeonpea (1839.64 kg/ha), rice (644.84 kg/ha), PEY (2044.48 kg/ha), LER (1.42) and MAI (13309.37)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting gave the maximum PEY, 2044.48 kg/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
PEYe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
2044.48 kg/hae1
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon resulted in maximum yield of both pigeonpea (1839.64 kg/ha), rice (644.84 kg/ha), PEY (2044.48 kg/ha), LER (1.42) and MAI (13309.37)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting gave the maximum LER, 1.42.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
LERe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
1.42e1
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon resulted in maximum yield of both pigeonpea (1839.64 kg/ha), rice (644.84 kg/ha), PEY (2044.48 kg/ha), LER (1.42) and MAI (13309.37)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting gave the maximum MAI, 13309.37.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
MAIe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
13309.37e1
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon resulted in maximum yield of both pigeonpea (1839.64 kg/ha), rice (644.84 kg/ha), PEY (2044.48 kg/ha), LER (1.42) and MAI (13309.37)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting performed better in net returns, 67158.68/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
bettere2
Value
67158.68/hae2
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also performed better in terms of net returns (67158.68/ha), B: C ratio (3.01) and RWUE both in terms of yield (2.25 kg/ha mm) and economic returns (73.72/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting performed better in B:C ratio, 3.01.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
B: C ratioe2
Direction
bettere2
Value
3.01e2
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also performed better in terms of net returns (67158.68/ha), B: C ratio (3.01) and RWUE both in terms of yield (2.25 kg/ha mm) and economic returns (73.72/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting gave RWUE of 2.25 kg/ha mm in terms of yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
RWUEe2
Direction
bettere2
Value
2.25 kg/ha mme2
Qualifier
in terms of yielde2
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also performed better in terms of net returns (67158.68/ha), B: C ratio (3.01) and RWUE both in terms of yield (2.25 kg/ha mm) and economic returns (73.72/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monsoon-onset planting gave RWUE of 73.72/ha-mm in economic returns.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoone1
Outcome
RWUEe2
Direction
bettere2
Value
73.72/ha-mme2
Qualifier
economic returnse2
Comparator
different planting methods testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the different planting methods tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of pigeon pea and rice at the onset of monsoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also performed better in terms of net returns (67158.68/ha), B: C ratio (3.01) and RWUE both in terms of yield (2.25 kg/ha mm) and economic returns (73.72/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full pigeonpea and rice population with hand weeding gave higher pigeonpea yield, 1463.33 kg/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane4
Treatment
100% population of both crops + hand weedinge4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
1463.33 kg/hae4
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% population of both crops + hand weeding resulted in higher yield of pigeonpea (1463.33 kg/ha) with PEY (1656.43 kg/ha), RWUE (1.87 kg/ha-mm and 54.35/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full pigeonpea and rice population with hand weeding gave higher PEY, 1656.43 kg/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100% population of both crops + hand weedinge4
Outcome
PEYe4
Direction
highere4
Value
1656.43 kg/hae4
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% population of both crops + hand weeding resulted in higher yield of pigeonpea (1463.33 kg/ha) with PEY (1656.43 kg/ha), RWUE (1.87 kg/ha-mm and 54.35/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full pigeonpea and rice population with hand weeding gave higher RWUE, 1.87 kg/ha mm.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100% population of both crops + hand weedinge4
Outcome
RWUEe4
Direction
highere4
Value
1.87 kg/ha-mme4
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% population of both crops + hand weeding resulted in higher yield of pigeonpea (1463.33 kg/ha) with PEY (1656.43 kg/ha), RWUE (1.87 kg/ha-mm and 54.35/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full pigeonpea and rice population with hand weeding gave higher economic RWUE, 54.35/ha-mm.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100% population of both crops + hand weedinge4
Outcome
RWUEe4
Direction
highere4
Value
54.35/ha-mme4
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% population of both crops + hand weeding resulted in higher yield of pigeonpea (1463.33 kg/ha) with PEY (1656.43 kg/ha), RWUE (1.87 kg/ha-mm and 54.35/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea 150% with rice 100% and no weeding gave the maximum rice yield, 613.30 kg/ha.

Treatment
150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of ricee5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
maximume5
Value
613.30 kg/hae5
Qualifier
no weedinge5
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e5

“maximum value of rice yield (613.30 kg/ha), LER (1.11) and MAI (7685.07) were reported in treatment involving 150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and no weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea 150% with rice 100% and no weeding gave the maximum rice LER, 1.11.

Treatment
150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of ricee5
Outcome
LERe5
Direction
maximume5
Value
1.11e5
Qualifier
no weedinge5
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e5

“maximum value of rice yield (613.30 kg/ha), LER (1.11) and MAI (7685.07) were reported in treatment involving 150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and no weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea 150% with rice 100% and no weeding gave the maximum MAI, 7685.07.

Treatment
150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of ricee5
Outcome
MAIe5
Direction
maximume5
Value
7685.07e5
Qualifier
no weedinge5
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e5

“maximum value of rice yield (613.30 kg/ha), LER (1.11) and MAI (7685.07) were reported in treatment involving 150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and no weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea 150% with rice 100% and hand weeding gave the highest net returns, 49389.77/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and hand weedinge6
Outcome
net returnse6
Direction
higheste6
Value
49389.77/hae6
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e6

“150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and hand weeding resulted in highest net returns of 49389.77/ha and B: C ratio of 2.31”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea 150% with rice 100% and hand weeding gave the highest B:C ratio, 2.31.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and hand weedinge6
Outcome
B: C ratioe6
Direction
higheste6
Value
2.31e6
Comparator
various weed management practicese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Out of the various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–828 · show in text ↑
e6

“150% population of pigeonpea + 100% population of rice and hand weeding resulted in highest net returns of 49389.77/ha and B: C ratio of 2.31”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Cajanus cajan · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.