Paper · 1977 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed Control in Pigeon Pea

Ruchira Singh; A. S. Faroda

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Lasso and Tok-E-25 at different levels and hoeings once or twice and complete weed free condition were tried alongwith a weedy check. Hoeings were found to be better than weedicides. Maximum additional net income over weedy check was obtained with one hoeing at 45 days after sowing. Growth and yield attributes were net affected due to weed control methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoeing gave better weed control than herbicides in pigeon pea.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Hoeingse0
Outcome
Weed Controlt0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
weedicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Control in Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hoeings were found to be better than weedicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One hoeing at 45 days after sowing gave the maximum additional net income over the weedy check in pigeon pea.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
one hoeing at 45 days after sowinge1
Outcome
additional net incomee1
Direction
Maximume1
Comparator
weedy checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Control in Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum additional net income over weedy check was obtained with one hoeing at 45 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield attributes of pigeon pea were not affected by weed control methods (the abstract prints "net affected").

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
weed control methodse1
Outcome
Growth and yield attributese1
Direction
net affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Control in Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth and yield attributes were net affected due to weed control methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–357 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.