Paper · 2018 · Engineering for Rural Development

Productivity of winter triticale depending on type of tillage in crop rotation

Boguslawa Jaskiewicz; Jerzy Grabinski; Ireneusz Ochmian

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In recent years, cereals have been increasingly grown in simplified crop rotations. The aim of the study was to determine the grain yield of winter triticale cultivars Cerber, Alekto and Fredro under plow or plowless tillage systems and different crop rotations. A three-year study was conducted at the Experimental Station of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Institute in Puawy, Poland. The yield of winter triticale depended on the weather conditions, crop rotations, method of tillage, and genetic factor. Under optimal rainfall, higher yields of winter triticale grain were obtained under ploughing. The grain yield was higher by 15 % compared to the simplified cultivation. In the crop rotation with a small percentage of cereals, the highest level of triticale yields was recorded, while lower triticale yields were obtained in the crop rotation with a large percentage of cereals. In plough cultivation conditions cvs. Cerber and Alekto showed higher yields (8.31 and 6.78 tha -1 ), whereas in simplified cultivation lower grain yield was (6.09 tha -1 ) cv.Fredro. Grain monoculture contributed to lowering the level of winter triticale yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter triticale yield depended on weather conditions, crop rotation, tillage method and genetic factor.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
method of tillagee1
Outcome
yielde1
Qualifier
weather conditions, crop rotationse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield of winter triticale depended on the weather conditions, crop rotations, method of tillage, and genetic factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under optimal rainfall, grain yield was 15% higher under ploughing than under simplified cultivation.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalee2
Treatment
ploughinge2
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
15 %e3
Qualifier
Under optimal rainfalle2
Comparator
simplified cultivatione3
Setting
Puawy, Polande4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Under optimal rainfall, higher yields of winter triticale grain were obtained under ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–619 · show in text ↑
e3

“The grain yield was higher by 15 % compared to the simplified cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–694 · show in text ↑
e4

“A three-year study was conducted at the Experimental Station of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Institute in Puawy, Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the crop rotation with a small percentage of cereals, triticale yield was highest.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee5
Treatment
crop rotation with a small percentage of cerealse5
Outcome
triticale yieldse5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
crop rotation with a large percentage of cerealse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In the crop rotation with a small percentage of cereals, the highest level of triticale yields was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–803 · show in text ↑
e6

“lower triticale yields were obtained in the crop rotation with a large percentage of cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the crop rotation with a large percentage of cereals, triticale yield was lower.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee6
Treatment
crop rotation with a large percentage of cerealse6
Outcome
triticale yieldse6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
crop rotation with a small percentage of cerealse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In the crop rotation with a small percentage of cereals, the highest level of triticale yields was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–803 · show in text ↑
e6

“lower triticale yields were obtained in the crop rotation with a large percentage of cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under plough cultivation, cultivar Cerber yielded 8.31 t/ha.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalee0
Material
Cerbere7
Treatment
plough cultivatione7
Outcome
yieldse7
Direction
highere7
Value
8.31e7
Comparator
simplified cultivatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of winter triticale cultivars Cerber, Alekto and Fredro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–193 · show in text ↑
e7

“In plough cultivation conditions cvs. Cerber and Alekto showed higher yields (8.31 and 6.78 tha -1 ), whereas in simplified cultivation lower grain yield was (6.09 tha -1 ) cv.Fredro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under plough cultivation, cultivar Alekto yielded 6.78 t/ha.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalee0
Material
Alektoe7
Treatment
plough cultivatione7
Outcome
yieldse7
Direction
highere7
Value
6.78e7
Comparator
simplified cultivatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of winter triticale cultivars Cerber, Alekto and Fredro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–193 · show in text ↑
e7

“In plough cultivation conditions cvs. Cerber and Alekto showed higher yields (8.31 and 6.78 tha -1 ), whereas in simplified cultivation lower grain yield was (6.09 tha -1 ) cv.Fredro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under simplified cultivation, cultivar Fredro yielded lower grain (6.09 t/ha) than under plough cultivation.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalee0
Material
Fredroe7
Treatment
simplified cultivatione7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
lowere7
Value
6.09 tha -1e7
Comparator
plough cultivatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of winter triticale cultivars Cerber, Alekto and Fredro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–193 · show in text ↑
e7

“In plough cultivation conditions cvs. Cerber and Alekto showed higher yields (8.31 and 6.78 tha -1 ), whereas in simplified cultivation lower grain yield was (6.09 tha -1 ) cv.Fredro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1087 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain monoculture contributed to lowering winter triticale yield.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
Grain monoculturee0
Outcome
level of winter triticale yielde0
Direction
loweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain monoculture contributed to lowering the level of winter triticale yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1166 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Triticale yield was lowest under cereal monoculture.

    YIELD OF SOME WINTER TRITICALE CULTIVARS AS AFFECTED BY THE TILLAGE SYSTEM · 2016 · compared with 50% of cereals in the structure of cropland

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tillage · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.