Abstract
The performance of the tractor-seeder can be influenced by factors related to the seeder, as loads and crop. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of tractor-seeder at sowing in the corn crop in function of the fertilizer systems (at presowing and at sowing) and those intercropping of crops (corn + bean-Stizolobium deeringianum, corn + bean-Cajanus cajan and corn + bean-Dolichos lab lab). The experiment was carried out at FCAV-UNESP with totally randomized delineation, on factorial scheme (2x3) with four repetitions. The use of fertilization during the pre-sowing resulted in greater displacement speed and effective field capacity in the corn sowing operation, without changing the distribution of corn seeds; however, it demanded more power and volumetric and weight hourly consumption of the tractor fuel.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-sowing fertilization gave greater displacement speed and effective field capacity in corn sowing than fertilization at sowing.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1 - Treatment
- fertilization during the pre-sowinge1
- Outcome
- displacement speed and effective field capacitye1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Comparator
- at sowinge2
- Setting
- FCAV-UNESPe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The use of fertilization during the pre-sowing resulted in greater displacement speed and effective field capacity in the corn sowing operation”
e2“fertilizer systems (at presowing and at sowing)”
e3“The experiment was carried out at FCAV-UNESP”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-sowing fertilization did not change the distribution of corn seeds compared with fertilization at sowing.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- fertilization during the pre-sowinge1
- Outcome
- distribution of corn seedse1
- Direction
- without changinge1
- Comparator
- at sowinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The use of fertilization during the pre-sowing resulted in greater displacement speed and effective field capacity in the corn sowing operation, without changing the distribution of corn seeds; however, it demanded more power and volumetric and weight hourly consumption of the tractor fuel”
e2“fertilizer systems (at presowing and at sowing)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-sowing fertilization demanded more power and more volumetric and weight hourly fuel consumption of the tractor than fertilization at sowing.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- fertilization during the pre-sowinge1
- Outcome
- power and volumetric and weight hourly consumption of the tractor fuele1
- Direction
- moree1
- Comparator
- at sowinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The use of fertilization during the pre-sowing resulted in greater displacement speed and effective field capacity in the corn sowing operation, without changing the distribution of corn seeds; however, it demanded more power and volumetric and weight hourly consumption of the tractor fuel”
e2“fertilizer systems (at presowing and at sowing)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 137 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
158 papers more in this group
See all 162 papers →fertilization · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
60 papers more in this group
See all 64 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.