Paper · 2018 · BioMed Research International

Ecotoxicological and Interactive Effects of Copper and Chromium on Physiochemical, Ultrastructural, and Molecular Profiling inBrassica napusL.

Lan Li; Kangni Zhang; Rafaqat A. Gill; et al.

12
claims
48
verbatim quotes
58
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Heavy metal accumulation causes huge environmental problems, particularly in agricultural ecosystems which have deteriorative effects on the yield and quality of crops. Individual copper (Cu) and chromium (Cr) effects have been investigated extensively in plants; however, co-contamination of Cu and Cr induced stress on Brassica napus L. is still unclear. In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758). Results showed that the application of Cr was more toxic than Cu, and their combined stress had shown a significant adverse effect on plant growth. Biomass and photosynthetic pigment were decreased remarkably under all metal treatments. Individual treatments of Cu and Cr and their combination cause the accumulation of ROS and lipid peroxidation. Moreover, the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars, except for the CAT activity which was decreased in both leaves and roots of sensitive cultivar Zheda 622 as compared with their respective controls. Additionally, nonenzymatic antioxidants like reduced and oxidized glutathione showed a differential activity pattern in roots and leaves of both cultivars. A more pronounced modification in chloroplast ultrastructure was observed in both cultivars under Cu+Cr treatment followed by Cr and Cu alone treatments. Furthermore, synergistic effects of Cu and Cr were prominent; this may be due to the enhanced metals uptake under combined treatment, which suggests that Cr and Cu interaction is not competitive but is rather additive and genotypic-dependent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cr was more toxic to B. napus than Cu.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Cre0
Outcome
toxice0
Direction
more toxice0
Comparator
Cue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of Cr was more toxic than Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Cu and Cr stress adversely affected growth.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
combined stresse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
adverse effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their combined stress had shown a significant adverse effect on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–630 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All metal treatments reduced biomass and photosynthetic pigment.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
all metal treatmentse0
Outcome
Biomass and photosynthetic pigmente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass and photosynthetic pigment were decreased remarkably under all metal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–719 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu treatment caused ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Cue0
Outcome
accumulation of ROS and lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual treatments of Cu and Cr and their combination cause the accumulation of ROS and lipid peroxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cr treatment caused ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Cre0
Outcome
accumulation of ROS and lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual treatments of Cu and Cr and their combination cause the accumulation of ROS and lipid peroxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Cu and Cr caused ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
their combinatione0
Outcome
accumulation of ROS and lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual treatments of Cu and Cr and their combination cause the accumulation of ROS and lipid peroxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities and transcription generally increased, especially under Cr or combined treatment.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatmente0
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity decreased in leaves and roots of Zheda 622 relative to controls.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Material
Zheda 622e0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatmente2
Gene
CATe0
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
their respective controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CAT activity which was decreased in both leaves and roots of sensitive cultivar Zheda 622 as compared with their respective controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1278 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and oxidized glutathione showed different activity patterns across roots and leaves.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Organ / stage
roots and leavese0
Outcome
differential activity patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced and oxidized glutathione showed a differential activity pattern in roots and leaves of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1434 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment modified chloroplast ultrastructure more than Cr or Cu alone.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Cu+Cr treatmente0
Outcome
modification in chloroplast ultrastructuree0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
Cr and Cu alone treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A more pronounced modification in chloroplast ultrastructure was observed in both cultivars under Cu+Cr treatment followed by Cr and Cu alone treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1588 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Cu and Cr showed synergistic effects, possibly through increased metal uptake.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
synergistic effects of Cu and Cre0
Qualifier
enhanced metals uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“synergistic effects of Cu and Cr were prominent; this may be due to the enhanced metals uptake under combined treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1722 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted the Cu and Cr interaction as additive and genotype dependent.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse1
Outcome
additive and genotypic-dependente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cr and Cu interaction is not competitive but is rather additive and genotypic-dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1831 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the present experiment, the interactive effects of Cu and Cr were studied in two B. napus cultivars (Zheda 622 and ZS 758).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–483 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and their mRNA transcription levels, such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidase, were increased, especially when treated with Cr alone or under Cu+Cr combined treatment in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑

copper atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

copper atom · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chromium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

chromium atom · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.