Paper · 2013 · Proceedings of ECOpole

Physiological response of Brassica napus L. plants to Cu(II) treatment

Matúš Peško; Katarína Kráľová

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rapeseed plants were exposed to seven different concentrations (0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 μmol · dm) of CuSO4·5H2O for 7 days. Within concentration range 0.5-3 μmol · dm a significant increase of biomass (both plant organs) was observed. Decrease of biomass was notable after application of concentrations higher than 6 μmol · dm. Considerable drop in content of chlorophylls as well as carotenoids was observed after application of 6 μmol · dm Cu(II). Decline of protein content in leaves of plants was observed in concentration range 6-60 μmol · dm. Lipid peroxidation expressed as a content of malondialdehyde in leaves was strong within concentration range 6-60 μmol · dm Cu(II). Bioaccumulation factor values of roots were higher then those of shoots in the whole concentration range (0.5-60 μmol · dm Cu). The portion of Cu allocated in shoots related to the total Cu amount accumulated by plant ranged from 27.6% (0.5 μmol · dm) to 8.4% (60 μmol · dm).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low Cu exposure increased biomass significantly.

Taxon
Rapeseed plantse1
Treatment
0.5-3 μmol · dme0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Within concentration range 0.5-3 μmol · dm a significant increase of biomass (both plant organs) was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu above 6 μmol · dm decreased biomass.

Taxon
Rapeseed plantse1
Treatment
concentrations higher than 6 μmol · dme0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
Decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decrease of biomass was notable after application of concentrations higher than 6 μmol · dm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu at 6 μmol · dm decreased chlorophylls and carotenoids.

Taxon
Rapeseed plantse1
Treatment
6 μmol · dm Cu(II)e0
Outcome
content of chlorophylls as well as carotenoidse0
Direction
drope0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable drop in content of chlorophylls as well as carotenoids was observed after application of 6 μmol · dm Cu(II).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–451 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu from 6 to 60 μmol · dm decreased leaf protein content.

Taxon
Rapeseed plantse1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
6-60 μmol · dme0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
Declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decline of protein content in leaves of plants was observed in concentration range 6-60 μmol · dm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf lipid peroxidation was strong at Cu from 6 to 60 μmol · dm.

Taxon
Rapeseed plantse1
Treatment
6-60 μmol · dm Cu(II)e0
Outcome
Lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
stronge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Lipid peroxidation expressed as a content of malondialdehyde in leaves was strong within concentration range 6-60 μmol · dm Cu(II).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots had greater Cu bioaccumulation factors than shoots.

Taxon
Rapeseed plantse1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Bioaccumulation factor valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
shootse0

Verbatim

e0

“Bioaccumulation factor values of roots were higher then those of shoots in the whole concentration range (0.5-60 μmol · dm Cu).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot share of accumulated Cu ranged from 27.6% to 8.4% across the concentrations.

Taxon
Rapeseed plantse1
Outcome
portion of Cu allocated in shootse0
Value
27.6%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The portion of Cu allocated in shoots related to the total Cu amount accumulated by plant ranged from 27.6% (0.5 μmol · dm) to 8.4% (60 μmol · dm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑

copper atom · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

copper atom · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.