Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Changes in physicochemical characteristics of guava fruits due to chitosan and calcium chloride treatments during storage

Shilpa Chawla; Reena Devi; Veena Jain

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of post-harvest treatments of chitosan and CaCl2 alone and in combination on the physico-chemical characteristics of guava (Hisar Surkha) fruits were studied. The fruits were treated with different concentrations of chitosan (0.5-3.0%) and CaCl2 (1.0-3.0%) for 5 min and evaluated for various physico-chemical parameters. Best concentration for chitosan (1.5%) was selected on the basis of quality-related parameters. For the storage study of guava, fruit were then treated with the selected concentration of chitosan in combination with different concentrations of CaCl2 (1.0-3.0%) for 5 min and then stored at room temperature (18oC). Pre-treatment of fruits with chitosan and CaCl2 alone and in combination significantly delayed decline in physiological loss in weight, total soluble solids and more retention of firmness, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars, phenols and total antioxidant activity during storage. The treatment of CaCl2 (1.5%)+chitosan (1.5%) was most effective treatment in modulating physico-chemical changes in guava fruits and enhancing keeping quality of guava during storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 1.5% was selected as the best concentration for quality parameters.

Treatment
chitosan (1.5%)e0
Outcome
Best concentratione0
Value
1.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best concentration for chitosan (1.5%) was selected on the basis of quality-related parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan and calcium chloride treatments significantly delayed declines in weight loss and soluble solids during storage.

Treatment
chitosan and CaCl2 alone and in combinatione0
Outcome
physiological loss in weight, total soluble solidse0
Direction
delayed declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-treatment of fruits with chitosan and CaCl2 alone and in combination significantly delayed decline in physiological loss in weight, total soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan and calcium chloride treatments retained fruit firmness, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars, phenols and antioxidant activity during storage.

Treatment
chitosan and CaCl2 alone and in combinatione1
Outcome
firmness, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars, phenols and total antioxidant activitye0
Direction
more retentione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more retention of firmness, acidity, ascorbic acid, sugars, phenols and total antioxidant activity during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pre-treatment of fruits with chitosan and CaCl2 alone and in combination significantly delayed decline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.5% calcium chloride plus 1.5% chitosan treatment was most effective for guava keeping quality.

Treatment
CaCl2 (1.5%)+chitosan (1.5%)e0
Outcome
keeping quality of guavae0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of CaCl2 (1.5%)+chitosan (1.5%) was most effective treatment in modulating physico-chemical changes in guava fruits and enhancing keeping quality of guava during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1104 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.