Paper · 1978 · Weed Science

Suppression of Pea(Pisum sativum)Root Rot by Dinitroaniline Herbicides

J. R. Teasdale; R. G. Harvey; D. J. Hagedorn

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nine substituted dinitronaline herbicides were studied to determine their effectiveness in controlling common root rot of peas (Pisum sativum L.) caused by Aphanomyces euteiches Drechs. under field conditions. Most of the dinitroaniline herbicide treatments increased plant stand, plant fresh weight, and shelled pea yield due to root rot suppression in each of the three years studied. Weed control was good in all plots and did not contribute to yield differences. Root rot suppression and crop injury were the primary determinants of yields. The greatest yield increases when compared with the weeded control were 82% for 0.56 kg/ha of dinitramine (N 4 , N 4 -diethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine) in 1974, 80% for 0.84 kg/ha of fluchloralin [ N -(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro- N -propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl) aniline] in 1975, and 26% for 1.68 kg/ha of pendimethalin [ N -(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] in 1976. The best average yield increases over all years were 54% for the combination of trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro- N,N -dipropyl- p -toluidine) and oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide) at 0.56 + 0.56 kg/ha, 49% for fluchloralin at 0.84 kg/ha, and 43% for pendimethalin at 0.84 kg/ha. Annual applications of 0.84 kg/ha of trifluralin delayed the rate of pathogen infestation of a field repeatedly planted to peas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most dinitroaniline treatments increased pea stand, fresh weight and shelled yield through root rot suppression.

Treatment
dinitroaniline herbicide treatmentse0
Interactor
Aphanomyces euteichesAphanomyces euteichese1pathogen
Outcome
plant stand, plant fresh weight, and shelled pea yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the dinitroaniline herbicide treatments increased plant stand, plant fresh weight, and shelled pea yield due to root rot suppression in each of the three years studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–385 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L.) caused by Aphanomyces euteiches Drechs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–185 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control did not account for yield differences among pea plots.

Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
did not contributee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control was good in all plots and did not contribute to yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–465 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–145 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root rot suppression and crop injury were primary determinants of pea yield.

Interactor
Aphanomyces euteichesAphanomyces euteichese1pathogen
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
primary determinantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root rot suppression and crop injury were the primary determinants of yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–543 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L.) caused by Aphanomyces euteiches Drechs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitramine at 0.56 kg/ha raised pea yield by 82% against weeded control in 1974.

Treatment
0.56 kg/ha of dinitraminee0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
82%e0
Qualifier
in 1974e2
Comparator
weeded controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest yield increases when compared with the weeded control were 82% for 0.56 kg/ha of dinitramine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–650 · show in text ↑
e1

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–145 · show in text ↑
e2

“in 1974”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluchloralin at 0.84 kg/ha raised pea yield by 80% against weeded control in 1975.

Treatment
0.84 kg/ha of fluchloraline0
Outcome
yield increasese1
Direction
increasese1
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
in 1975e3
Comparator
weeded controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“80% for 0.84 kg/ha of fluchloralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greatest yield increases when compared with the weeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–611 · show in text ↑
e2

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–145 · show in text ↑
e3

“in 1975”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin at 1.68 kg/ha raised pea yield by 26% against weeded control in 1976.

Treatment
1.68 kg/ha of pendimethaline0
Outcome
yield increasese1
Direction
increasese1
Value
26%e0
Qualifier
in 1976e3
Comparator
weeded controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“26% for 1.68 kg/ha of pendimethalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greatest yield increases when compared with the weeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–611 · show in text ↑
e2

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–145 · show in text ↑
e3

“in 1976”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin plus oryzalin at 0.56 + 0.56 kg/ha gave a 54% mean yield increase across years.

Treatment
combination of trifluraline0
Outcome
average yield increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
54%e0
Qualifier
over all yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best average yield increases over all years were 54% for the combination of trifluralin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“and oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide) at 0.56 + 0.56 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1184 · show in text ↑
e2

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluchloralin at 0.84 kg/ha gave a 49% mean pea yield increase across years.

Treatment
fluchloralin at 0.84 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield increasese1
Direction
increasese1
Value
49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“49% for fluchloralin at 0.84 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1220 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best average yield increases over all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–999 · show in text ↑
e2

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin at 0.84 kg/ha gave a 43% mean pea yield increase across years.

Treatment
pendimethalin at 0.84 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield increasese1
Direction
increasese1
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“43% for pendimethalin at 0.84 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1261 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best average yield increases over all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–999 · show in text ↑
e2

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual trifluralin at 0.84 kg/ha delayed pathogen infestation in repeatedly planted pea fields.

Treatment
0.84 kg/ha of trifluraline0
Interactor
Aphanomyces euteichesAphanomyces euteichese1pathogen
Outcome
rate of pathogen infestatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Annual applications of 0.84 kg/ha of trifluralin delayed the rate of pathogen infestation of a field repeatedly planted to peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1390 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aphanomyces euteiches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–177 · show in text ↑

trifluralin · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Dinitramine · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Fluchloralin · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · Aphanomyces euteiches · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.