Paper · 2018 · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture

Response of winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency to deficit irrigation in the North China Plain

Huifang Han; Yujie Ren Zhenxing Yan

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water resources in the North China Plain (NCP) are limited, so it’s in urgent need to optimize deficit by irrigation for sustainable winter wheat production in this area. Winter wheat grain yield (GY), contribution of dry matter (DM) remobilization to GY (CDMRG), and water use efficiency (WUE) were investigated in NCP. Compared with non-irrigation treatment, irrigated with 60 mm each at the winter wheat jointing stage (JS) and heading stage (HS) achieved reasonable winter wheat GY and WUE. Compared with irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS) of winter wheat, irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HS provided the highest CDMRG, which resulted to the highest GY and WUE; this result was mainly due to a significant increase of the spike numbers (SN) per m2. The results suggest that in the NCP, in order to achieve reasonable GY and WUE, winter wheat should be irrigated with 60 mm each at JS and HS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation of 60 mm at jointing and heading achieved reasonable winter wheat GY versus no irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
irrigated with 60 mm each at the winter wheat jointing stage (JS) and heading stage (HS)e0
Outcome
winter wheat GYe0
Comparator
non-irrigation treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with non-irrigation treatment, irrigated with 60 mm each at the winter wheat jointing stage (JS) and heading stage (HS) achieved reasonable winter wheat GY and WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation of 60 mm at jointing and heading achieved reasonable WUE versus no irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
irrigated with 60 mm each at the winter wheat jointing stage (JS) and heading stage (HS)e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Comparator
non-irrigation treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with non-irrigation treatment, irrigated with 60 mm each at the winter wheat jointing stage (JS) and heading stage (HS) achieved reasonable winter wheat GY and WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 mm jointing and heading schedule yielded the highest CDMRG versus alternative schedules.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HSe0
Outcome
CDMRGe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS) of winter wheat, irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HS provided the highest CDMRG, which resulted to the highest GY and WUE; this result was mainly due to a significant increase of the spike numbers (SN) per m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 mm jointing and heading schedule yielded the highest GY versus alternative schedules.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HSe0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS) of winter wheat, irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HS provided the highest CDMRG, which resulted to the highest GY and WUE; this result was mainly due to a significant increase of the spike numbers (SN) per m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 mm jointing and heading schedule yielded the highest WUE versus alternative schedules.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HSe0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS) of winter wheat, irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HS provided the highest CDMRG, which resulted to the highest GY and WUE; this result was mainly due to a significant increase of the spike numbers (SN) per m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 mm jointing and heading schedule yielded the highest spike numbers (SN) per m2 versus alternative schedules.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HSe0
Outcome
spike numbers (SN) per m2e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS) of winter wheat, irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HS provided the highest CDMRG, which resulted to the highest GY and WUE; this result was mainly due to a significant increase of the spike numbers (SN) per m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The spike number increase was proposed to explain the high yield and water use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
highest GY and WUEe0
Qualifier
significant increase of the spike numbers (SN) per m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with irrigation with 120 mm only at JS and irrigation with 40 mm each at JS, HS, and milking stage (MS) of winter wheat, irrigation with 60 mm each at JS and HS provided the highest CDMRG, which resulted to the highest GY and WUE; this result was mainly due to a significant increase of the spike numbers (SN) per m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 mm irrigation at both jointing and heading in the NCP for reasonable grain yield and water use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
winter wheat should be irrigated with 60 mm each at JS and HSe0
Setting
NCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that in the NCP, in order to achieve reasonable GY and WUE, winter wheat should be irrigated with 60 mm each at JS and HS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–964 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.